Patterned Offset Pole Rotor for Torque Ripple Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electric machines in electrified vehicles face challenges in reducing torque ripple and achieving balanced rotor performance due to limitations in existing skewing methods, particularly in designs with shorter stack lengths and varying magnetic flux harmonics.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves a rotor assembly with laminations arranged such that pairs of angles between magnetic axes and interpolar axes define a repeating sequence, allowing for both axial and radial skewing to reduce torque ripple and enhance rotor balancing, noise reduction, and magnetic flux harmonics. This includes specific angle distributions and resequencing of poles to maintain symmetry and optimize performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If traditional skewing methods are used in rotor design, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but torque ripple reduction is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidtorque ripple
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by implementing different skew angles for different pole pairs in the rotor. Specifically, first and second pole pairs have a first skew angle, while third and fourth pole pairs have a second skew angle that is different from the first. This asymmetric skewing pattern creates intentional magnetic flux distribution variations that reduce torque ripple and improve rotor performance without complicating the manufacturing process excessively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Ease of manufacture

If uniform skewing is applied to all poles, then manufacturing is simplified, but rotor balancing and noise reduction are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveskewing uniformityVSAvoidnoise and vibration
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality by applying different skewing characteristics to different regions of the rotor. Specifically, adjacent pole pairs (first and second) have a first skew angle, while other adjacent pole pairs (third and fourth) have a second skew angle. This localized variation in skewing angles optimizes magnetic flux distribution in specific rotor regions, thereby reducing noise and vibration without requiring complete redesign of the entire rotor structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Length of moving object

If stack length is reduced to meet design constraints, then device size is minimized, but torque ripple increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestack lengthVSAvoidtorque ripple
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the skew angle parameter to compensate for reduced stack length. By implementing specific skew angles (first skew angle for first and second pole pairs, second skew angle for third and fourth pole pairs), the design maintains optimal magnetic flux distribution even with shorter stack length, thereby reducing torque ripple while meeting size constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces torque ripple, improves rotor balancing, and minimizes noise and vibration (NVH) while maintaining efficient magnetic flux and voltage harmonics, enhancing the overall performance of electric machines in electrified vehicles.

Implementation Method 1

a plurality of laminations each defining a plurality of poles arranged such that values of a pair of angles corresponding to each of the poles and defined between a magnetic axis of the pole and respective interpolar axes adjacent thereto are different

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic flux: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentUS10505416B2Patterned offset pole rotor
Publication Date: 2019.12.10 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US10505416B2 patent drawing
  • US10505416B2 patent drawing
  • US10505416B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A rotor assembly has a rotor including a plurality of laminations each defining a plurality of poles arranged such that values of a pair of angles corresponding to each of the poles and defined between a magnetic axis of the pole and respective interpolar axes adjacent thereto are different. The values of the pairs define a repeating sequence around the lamination. The angles opposite an axis of rotation of the rotor are equal.