PatternMap Relational Analysis for Biological Image Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current biological image analysis software lacks efficient tools for detecting and analyzing relational patterns among biological objects, particularly in complex, variable, and large datasets, leading to inefficiencies and low repeatability due to reliance on manual methods and imprecise image processing techniques.

Innovation Solution

The development of a general-purpose tool called PatternMap that enables the detection and analysis of relational patterns in biological images by creating user-defined features and supporting interactive feature mining, allowing for efficient pattern creation, validation, and comparison across experimental conditions, with the ability to normalize distortion and inter-sample variations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual analysis methods are used to detect relational patterns among biological objects, then flexibility in analysis approach is maintained, but productivity and repeatability are severely limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in analysis approachVSAvoidproductivity and repeatability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex task of relational pattern analysis into distinct modular components: image input module, relational pattern detection module, feature extraction module, and analysis module. Each module handles a specific aspect of the analysis, enabling automated processing while maintaining flexibility through configurable parameters and user-defined features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system is designed as a universal platform that can analyze multiple types of biological images (confocal, spectral, widefield) and detect various relational patterns (spatial arrangement, co-localization, proximity) using a single integrated software environment. The system supports both automated analysis and user-defined custom features, providing multi-functionality that replaces multiple specialized manual analysis tools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If automated image processing techniques are implemented to improve productivity, then measurement precision and repeatability are compromised due to imprecise algorithms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation capabilityVSAvoidmeasurement precision and repeatability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where detected relational patterns and extracted features are validated against established biological criteria and user-defined parameters. The analysis results provide feedback that can be used to refine detection parameters and improve measurement precision through iterative optimization, ensuring automated processing maintains high repeatability and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables dynamic adjustment of analysis parameters including distance thresholds, spatial relationship criteria, and feature extraction parameters. This allows optimization of measurement precision for different biological contexts while maintaining automated processing capability. Users can modify parameters based on specific experimental conditions to achieve both high productivity and measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If comprehensive relational pattern analysis is performed on large datasets with many object classes, then detection capability is enhanced, but device complexity and computational requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidsoftware complexity and computational requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex analysis of large datasets with multiple object classes into hierarchical levels: individual object detection, pairwise relational analysis, and population-level pattern detection. This segmentation allows comprehensive analysis to be performed in manageable stages, reducing computational complexity while maintaining detection capability across all object classes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements partial analysis by allowing users to focus on specific relational patterns or subsets of object classes when analyzing large datasets. Rather than requiring complete analysis of all possible relationships, the system enables targeted detection of biologically relevant patterns, reducing computational requirements while maintaining detection capability for key relationships.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple object classes with variable object counts are analyzed simultaneously, then biological insight is improved, but measurement complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to handle variable object classesVSAvoidmeasurement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides universal measurement capabilities that work across variable numbers of object classes. The same relational pattern detection algorithms and feature extraction methods are applied regardless of whether analyzing two chromosome classes or twenty cell types, simplifying the measurement process while maintaining adaptability to different experimental designs and object class configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS7856136B2Analysis of patterns among objects of a plurality of classes
Publication Date: 2010.12.21 LEICA MICROSYSTEMS CMS GMBH
  • US7856136B2 patent drawing
  • US7856136B2 patent drawing
  • US7856136B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for the detection and analysis of patterns receives an image containing object labels and performs relational feature development using the input image to create at least one pattern map. It then performs relational feature analysis using the at least one pattern map to create a relational feature analysis result. The pattern detection and analysis method further comprises a recipe for automation control and includes determination of a genetic anomaly.A relational feature development method receives an image containing object labels and performs core measurement table development using the input image to create at least one core measurement table. It then performs feature table production using the at least one core measurement table to create at least one feature table. It also performs PatternMap creation using the at least one feature table to create a PatternMap. The relational feature development method further comprises a PatternMap integration and update step to create an updated PatternMap.A boundary distance measurement receives an image containing object labels and performs structure object mask production using the input image to create structure object mask. It then performs inner distance transform using the structure object mask to create inner distance transform image and finds individual object centroid using the input image to create individual object centroid output. In addition, it finds object boundary distance using the individual object centroid and the inner distance transform image to create object boundary distance output.