Pavement Management Application Optimizing Maintenance Prioritization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems face challenges in accurately comparing and prioritizing infrastructure assets, such as roads and bridges, due to the complexity of assessing deterioration factors with varying severity and density.

Innovation Solution

A Pavement Management Application (PMA) computer system that uses a processor and tangible memory to execute a pavement repair program. This program determines major maintenance and repair costs by analyzing input data such as pavement condition index, inspection history, work history, and predicted conditions to calculate return-on-investment (ROI) and estimated uniform annual cost (EUAC).

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If standardized classification systems are used to assess infrastructure assets, then resource allocation can be prioritized, but it becomes difficult to accurately compare and prioritize assets with multiple deterioration factors at varying severity levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation efficiencyVSAvoidasset comparison accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms multiple deterioration parameters (crack density, fault severity, distress types) into a single integrated Pavement Condition Index (PCI) value. This parameter transformation allows assets to be compared on a unified scale while preserving the underlying complexity of multiple deterioration factors, resolving the contradiction between simplified resource allocation and accurate asset comparison.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If multiple deterioration factors are tracked with varying severity and density, then comprehensive asset assessment is achieved, but accurate prioritization and comparison of assets becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveasset assessment completenessVSAvoidprioritization system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple deterioration factors (cracks, faults, distresses) into a single PCI value through a systematic indexing process. This consolidation maintains comprehensive assessment by considering all deterioration types while simplifying prioritization by providing a single comparable metric, thus resolving the contradiction between assessment completeness and system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the complex assessment process into distinct phases: data collection of multiple deterioration factors, processing through standardized classification, and aggregation into PCI values. This segmentation allows comprehensive tracking of individual factors while simplifying the final prioritization decision through unified index comparison.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250103992A1System and method for determining pavement condition index of a family of pavement
Publication Date: 2025.03.27 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA THE AS REPRESENTED BY THE SEC OF THE ARMY
  • US20250103992A1 patent drawing
  • US20250103992A1 patent drawing
  • US20250103992A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A specialized computer running pavement management application (PMA) software may be configured to apply risk cost and return on investment analysis to determine an optimized work plan for maintenance and repairs of a network of pavement sections. The PMA may be configured to incorporate global maintenance and repair activities (such as surface treatments), major maintenance and repair activities (such as overlays and reconstruction), and localized preventative maintenance and repair activities (such as crack sealing and patching).