Automated Pavement Marking Detection and Quality Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for applying and evaluating pavement markings on roadways rely heavily on manual processes, which are time-consuming, prone to errors, and lack efficiency, especially in determining the location and quality of markings.

Innovation Solution

A computer-based system utilizing sensors, cameras, and augmented reality to automatically determine the location and quality of pavement markings, providing data for robotic vehicles or drones to apply markings accurately and efficiently, and to assess when re-painting is necessary.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If manual measurement and inspection methods are used to determine pavement marking locations and quality, then the process is simple to implement, but the time consumption and labor requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of implementationVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical measurement and inspection methods with an automated computer-based system that uses sensors, cameras, and image processing algorithms to detect pavement marking locations and evaluate their quality, thereby eliminating the time-consuming manual processes while maintaining implementation feasibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by allowing the computer to automatically determine pavement marking locations, assess their quality against predefined criteria, and generate reports without requiring manual intervention at each step, thus reducing both time consumption and labor requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Device complexity

If manual processes are used to determine pavement marking locations and evaluate quality, then the system complexity is low, but the accuracy and precision of measurements decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidmeasurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes manual visual inspection with automated optical sensors and camera-based image processing systems that provide precise measurement of pavement marking dimensions, positions, and conditions, significantly improving measurement accuracy while introducing moderate system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates digital copies of pavement markings through image capture and processing, allowing for precise digital measurement and analysis of marking dimensions, reflectivity, and condition without physical contact, thereby enhancing measurement precision through computational analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If automated computer-based systems with sensors and cameras are deployed to determine pavement marking locations and quality, then the productivity and efficiency improve, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improve工作效率VSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a multi-functional integrated system where a single computer-based platform performs multiple tasks including location determination, quality assessment, data analysis, and report generation, thereby improving overall productivity while managing device complexity through functional integration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges multiple functions (sensor data acquisition, image processing, quality evaluation, and decision support) into a unified automated platform, enhancing productivity by eliminating sequential manual operations while consolidating system complexity into an integrated architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Ease of operation

If manual inspection is used to evaluate pavement marking quality, then the ease of operation is maintained, but the reliability and consistency of quality assessment decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidquality assessment reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where the computer system automatically compares detected pavement marking characteristics against predefined quality criteria and standards, providing consistent and reliable quality assessments that eliminate human subjectivity while maintaining ease of operation through automated decision support

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual quality judgment with automated image processing and analysis algorithms that objectively measure pavement marking properties such as reflectivity, dimensions, and condition, thereby improving assessment reliability and consistency while requiring minimal operational intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10068133B2Pavement marking determination
Publication Date: 2018.09.04 HCL TECH LTD
  • US10068133B2 patent drawing
  • US10068133B2 patent drawing
  • US10068133B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an approach to determining pavement markings, a computer determines a location of a first computing device based on data received from one or more location devices associated with the first computing device. The computer then retrieves pavement marking data for one or more pavement markings for the location and determines whether one or more existing pavement markings are present at the location. Responsive to determining that one or more existing pavement markings are present at the location, the computer determines whether each of the one or more existing pavement markings meet one or more pre-determined thresholds for an acceptable pavement marking quality. Furthermore, responsive to determining each of the one or more existing pavement markings do not meet the one or more pre-determined thresholds for an acceptable pavement marking quality level, the computer provides pavement marking data to the first computing device.