Paver Lockdown System Using Steel Tabs and Pedestal Engagement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing solutions for securing pavers on rooftops against strong winds either compromise aesthetics, are not strong enough, or hinder access for maintenance, as they either require visible screws, rely on a single small screw for stability, or make it impossible to lift pavers for repairs.

Innovation Solution

A 1.2-1.5 mm thick galvanized steel sheet with securing tabs glued to the back of pavers, combined with a metal lock, sliding spacer, or nut system that allows secure locking and easy unlocking of pavers, ensuring stability without visible fasteners and allowing access for maintenance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If screws are used to secure pavers to pedestals, then safety against wind uplift is improved, but aesthetic value deteriorates due to visible screw holes and caps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety against wind upliftVSAvoidaesthetic value
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the visible screw holes from the paver surface by using a tab mechanism that engages with the pedestal without requiring holes in the paver. The locking mechanism is extracted from the visible surface and placed in the joint space between pavers, eliminating the aesthetic degradation caused by visible fasteners while maintaining secure attachment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Device complexity

If a single small screw is used to hold down four pavers, then device complexity is reduced, but strength and reliability deteriorate as the fine threads cannot withstand hurricane wind forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidstrength against wind uplift
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the locking function into multiple independent tabs (typically four tabs, one for each paver corner), with each tab having its own engagement mechanism with the pedestal. This segmentation distributes the wind uplift forces across multiple attachment points, significantly increasing overall strength while maintaining relatively simple individual tab components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple tabs onto a single steel sheet that is attached to the back of the paver. This merging allows four separate locking functions to be integrated into one piece, simplifying installation while providing distributed strength through multiple engagement points with the pedestal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If pavers are glued to pedestals, then safety against wind uplift is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates as repair workers cannot lift pavers to access wires and pipes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety against wind upliftVSAvoidease of paver removal for maintenance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a dynamic locking system where the tab can be easily moved between locked and unlocked positions. The tab is designed to engage with the pedestal in a locked position for wind resistance, but can be quickly disengaged using a simple tool, allowing rapid transition between secure attachment and maintenance access states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a simple tool (such as a screwdriver) as an intermediary to operate the locking mechanism. This intermediary allows repair workers to easily unlock and remove pavers without requiring special tools or complex procedures, while the mechanism itself remains secure against wind forces during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Shape

If visible caps are used to cover screw holes, then aesthetic value is partially improved, but device complexity increases and the solution is still not acceptable to architects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaesthetic valueVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent completely removes the need for caps by eliminating visible screw holes from the design. Instead of covering up the aesthetic problem, the solution extracts the fastening function from the visible surface and places it in the hidden joint space between pavers, making caps unnecessary and eliminating the associated complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively prevents paver uplift during strong winds, maintains aesthetic appeal, and provides additional safety by supporting weight even if the paver breaks, while allowing easy access for repairs.

Implementation Method 1

a 1.2-1.5 mm thick galvanized steel sheet with securing tabs glued to the back of pavers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesive bonding: Adhesive

Implementation Method 2

combined with a metal lock, sliding spacer, or nut system that allows secure locking and easy unlocking of pavers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical fastening: Mechanical Fastener

Data Source

PatentUS20200263434A1Paver lockdown systems against wind uplift that work with regular pedestals
Publication Date: 2020.08.20 YANG YONGZHI
  • US20200263434A1 patent drawing
  • US20200263434A1 patent drawing
  • US20200263434A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a paver lockdown system that prevents strong wind from uplifting pavers from pedestals installed on rooftops.