Aerospace Pawl Latch with Visual Safety Indication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pawl latches in aerospace applications lack a reliable mechanism for ensuring secure engagement and visual indication of closure, particularly for removable and moveable elements like hatches and doors, which can lead to misalignment and safety issues.

Innovation Solution

A pawl latch system comprising a pin assembly with a star wheel for adjustable axial travel and a receiver assembly with a cam, slider, and spring-loaded arms that rotate to lock the pin, providing a visual safety feature to prevent axial movement if the pin is not fully engaged, ensuring secure locking and indicating closure status.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a traditional pawl latch mechanism is used, then the structure is simple, but the reliability of secure engagement and visual indication is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecure engagement reliabilityVSAvoidlatch mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a nested structure where the pawl arms are positioned within the receiver housing, the stop arms are nested within the receiver housing, and the cam mechanism is integrated within the same housing. This nesting approach allows multiple functional components to occupy the same spatial envelope, enhancing reliability through integrated design while controlling overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary components including spring-loaded pawl arms that mediate between the pin assembly and the housing, and stop arms with visual indicators that mediate between the internal locking mechanism and external observation. These intermediaries enhance secure engagement reliability by providing mechanical mediation and visual feedback without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If the pin assembly is allowed to move axially without restriction, then the ease of operation is improved, but the safety and precision of engagement is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengagement precisionVSAvoidpin insertion ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic elements including spring-loaded pawl arms that can flex during pin insertion to accommodate minor misalignments, and a cam mechanism that dynamically transitions between engagement and disengagement positions. The spring-loaded stop arms with visual indicators provide dynamic feedback during the engagement process. These dynamic features maintain ease of operation while ensuring precise engagement through controlled movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements beforehand cushioning through spring-loaded pawl arms and stop arms that can absorb misalignment forces during pin insertion. The springs provide compliant engagement that tolerates manufacturing tolerances and assembly variations, ensuring precise final engagement position while maintaining ease of operation by preventing binding or binding during insertion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Reliability

If visual indication of closure status is added, then the safety is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosure status indication reliabilityVSAvoidindication mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service visual indication where the stop arms themselves serve dual functions: mechanical stopping/locking and visual status indication. The arms are positioned such that their engagement or disengagement position is directly observable, providing automatic visual feedback without requiring separate indication mechanisms. This self-service approach enhances safety through reliable status indication while minimizing additional complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies multi-functionality to the stop arms, which simultaneously perform mechanical locking function and visual indication function. The same physical components that prevent premature axial movement also provide observable status indicators. This universal design enhances closure status indication reliability while avoiding the complexity increase that would result from adding separate indication mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If the slider is prevented from moving unless fully engaged, then the safety is improved, but the ease of operation is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengagement safetyVSAvoidslider operation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary anti-action through stop arms positioned to prevent premature axial movement of the pin assembly before full engagement. The spring-loaded stop arms are pre-positioned to block axial movement until the pin reaches its fully engaged position, at which point the pawl arms can complete the locking action. This preliminary prevention enhances engagement safety while maintaining ease of operation through automatic engagement mechanics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs feedback mechanisms where the stop arms provide mechanical feedback by blocking slider movement until proper engagement is achieved, and visual feedback through observable arm positions. The spring-loaded nature of the stop and pawl arms provides tactile feedback during engagement. This multi-sensory feedback system enhances engagement safety while guiding the operator through the engagement process, maintaining ease of operation through intuitive feedback rather than forcing complex manual control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3322639B1PAWL latch
Publication Date: 2019.03.27 ALCOA INC
  • EP3322639B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3322639B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3322639B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A pawl latch (10) having a pin assembly (12) with a pin (22) and a receiver assembly (14) adapted to receive the pin assembly (12). The receiver assembly (14) includes a receiver housing (40) having a slider (50) positioned slidably on the receiver housing (40), a cam (54) rotatably mounted in the receiver housing (40), and a link (58) connecting the cam (54) and the slider (50). Rotating the cam (54) moves the slider (50) along the receiver housing (40). The receiver assembly (14) includes a pawl (60) and a stop (62), each having arms (61), respectively, that rotate. When the receiver assembly (14) receives the pin assembly (12), contacts the arms (63) of the stop (62) and facilitates their rotation, in which the cam (54) is enabled to be rotated and, in turn, facilitates movement of the slider (50). The arms (61) of the pawl (60) are rotated in order to lock the pin head (27) of the pin assembly (12) within the receiver assembly (14).