Pay Equity Analysis System Using Segmented Data Harmonization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Employers face challenges in understanding and addressing pay gaps between genders and races due to the complexity of evaluating pay equity and opportunity equity within their organizations, which requires real-time data analysis and compliance with various laws, but existing methods often fail to provide actionable insights in a timely and compliant manner.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system for analyzing pay policies, which includes receiving pay data, determining controls, calculating equitable pay ranges, and providing insights on pay equity and opportunity equity, using robust statistical analysis to identify issues and prevent future disparities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If real-time data analysis is performed to evaluate pay equity and opportunity equity, then actionable insights are provided in a timely manner, but the complexity of data aggregation, harmonization, and consolidation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime for pay equity analysisVSAvoidcomplexity of data aggregation and analysis system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex data aggregation process into distinct modules: individual level data collection, group level data collection, and policy level data collection. Each module handles specific data types separately before integrating them through standardized harmonization protocols, reducing the overall complexity of real-time analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary data harmonization layer that standardizes diverse data formats from multiple sources (HRIS, compensation systems, external datasets) into a unified structure. This intermediary layer abstracts the complexity of data aggregation from the analysis layer, enabling real-time processing without exposing users to underlying data complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If comprehensive statistical analysis is performed to ensure compliance with pay equity laws, then legal compliance is improved, but the time required for analysis increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance with pay equity lawsVSAvoidtime for statistical analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary data preparation and control determination before formal statistical analysis. By pre-aggregating data, pre-harmonizing formats, and pre-identifying relevant controls (such as job level, location, and experience factors), the system reduces the time required for actual compliance analysis while maintaining comprehensive statistical rigor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops that continuously monitor analysis results against legal compliance thresholds. When potential non-compliance is detected, the system automatically triggers remediation workflows and updates controls in real-time, ensuring ongoing compliance without requiring repeated manual analysis cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If dynamic evaluation of pay policies is performed to identify bias and inconsistency, then actionable insights are improved, but the computational resources and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproductivity of pay policy evaluationVSAvoidcomputational resources for statistical analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality analysis by evaluating pay policies at multiple granular levels (individual employee level, department level, job level) with differentiated computational intensity. Simple descriptive statistics are applied at higher levels where data volume is large, while detailed bias analysis is applied at lower levels where sample sizes are smaller, optimizing the balance between insight quality and computational resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20220383259A1Dynamically evaluating the consistency, bias, legitimacy, or intended effects of employment policies
Publication Date: 2022.12.01 SYNDIO SOLUTIONS INC
  • US20220383259A1 patent drawing
  • US20220383259A1 patent drawing
  • US20220383259A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are example embodiments of a methods and systems for analyzing and determining impact (or lack thereof) on any selected group or groups of employees of selected pay policies. An example includes a computer-implemented method for analyzing and determining impact on selected group of employees of selected pay policies. The method including receiving a first pay data for the selected group of employees. The method also including determining one or more controls for the selected group of employees. Additionally, the method including calculating an equitable pay range for the selected group of employees based on the one or more controls. The method also including receiving a user input, wherein the user input requests a second pay data relates to an employee, and is based on a selected control. The method also including calculating the second pay data; and sending the second pay data for display.