Centralized Payment Card Acceptance Issue Classification and Remediation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for addressing payment card acceptance issues in payment networks are ad hoc and lack a centralized approach for classification, remediation, and impact assessment, preventing global resolution and effective monitoring across the network.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system using a Customer Quality Acceptance (CQA) computing device that receives notifications of acceptance issues, classifies them, determines remediations, tracks the issues and remediations using a single database, and assesses financial and customer quality impacts, ensuring comprehensive management and implementation of solutions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a centralized system for managing acceptance issues is implemented, then the ability to globally address and monitor acceptance issues improves, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacceptance issue resolution effectivenessVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The centralized system segments acceptance issue management into distinct functional modules: notification reception, classification, investigation, remediation determination, tracking, and impact assessment. Each module handles a specific aspect of the issue resolution process, improving overall system reliability while keeping individual components manageable in complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The payment network acts as an intermediary between various participants (issuers, acquirers, merchants) to centrally manage acceptance issues. This intermediary role enables global addressing of issues without requiring direct complex interactions between all participants, thus improving resolution effectiveness while maintaining manageable system structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Speed

If ad hoc remediation processes are used by individual areas, then local response speed improves, but the ability to apply remediations globally across the network deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocal response timeVSAvoidglobal remediation applicability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where investigation results and remediation outcomes from any area are captured and fed back to the centralized system. This enables the classification model to learn from local experiences and apply improved remediations globally, balancing local response speed with global adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The centralized system creates universal remediation strategies that can be applied across multiple areas of the payment network. By classifying acceptance issues into standardized categories and developing universal remediation approaches, the system enables local areas to benefit from globally optimized solutions while maintaining their operational autonomy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive tracking and impact assessment are implemented, then the quality of acceptance issue management improves, but the resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact assessment accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements partial tracking and impact assessment by focusing on the most critical acceptance issue categories and their primary impacts. Rather than comprehensively analyzing every possible aspect of each issue, the system identifies and measures the most significant factors, achieving adequate measurement precision while conserving computational resources

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11170377B2Methods and systems for improving payment card acceptance quality
Publication Date: 2021.11.09 MASTERCARD INT INC
  • US11170377B2 patent drawing
  • US11170377B2 patent drawing
  • US11170377B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for resolving an acceptance issue on a payment network are provided. The method includes receiving a notification message of an acceptance issue. The acceptance issue relates to an attempt by a cardholder to complete a transaction using a payment card over the payment network that is rejected. The method also includes classifying, by a computer device, the acceptance issue based on at least one of the notification message and results data of a first investigation, determining a remediation of the acceptance issue based on the classification and/or results data of a second investigation, and tracking, by the computer device, the acceptance issue, the classification, and the remediation using a single database. The method further includes implementing the determined remediation, and determining, by the computer device, at least one of a financial impact and a customer quality impact of the acceptance issue.