Remote Payment Card Switching for Real-Time Fraud Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing payment systems lack direct control by the holder over payment instruments, leading to increased risk of fraud and abuse due to always-on functionality, with delayed mitigation processes requiring human intervention.

Innovation Solution

A computer system and method allowing payment vehicle holders to enable or disable their payment vehicles remotely through text messages or emails, providing automated control without human intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If payment instruments are always turned on for use, then ease of operation is improved, but security and control are worsened due to increased fraud and abuse risk

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveease of useVSAvoidfraud and abuse risk

Core Design Contradiction:

Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic control of payment instrument status by allowing holders to switch between enabled and disabled states remotely. The system transitions from a static always-on state to a dynamic state that can be changed in real-time based on security needs, while maintaining ease of operation through automated remote access via communication devices.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables payment instrument holders to independently control their own instruments without requiring customer service representative intervention. The automated system allows holders to enable, disable, or check status of their payment instruments directly through communication devices, eliminating the need for human assistance and reducing response time.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If payment instruments are always turned on for use, then productivity is improved, but reliability is worsened due to lack of real-time control

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvetransaction processingVSAvoidcontrol and security

Core Design Contradiction:

ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary security measures by enabling holders to disable payment instruments in advance before fraudulent activity can occur. The system allows proactive control where holders can prevent unauthorized transactions by switching instruments off before misuse happens, rather than reacting after fraud occurs.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms that provide real-time status information about payment instruments to holders through communication devices. The system continuously communicates instrument status back to holders, enabling them to make informed decisions about enabling or disabling instruments based on current security conditions.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #23Feedback

3Object-affected harmful factors

If customer service representatives are used to block or cancel payment instruments, then security is improved, but loss of time increases due to delays in mitigation

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvefraud mitigationVSAvoidresponse time

Core Design Contradiction:

Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates the need for customer service representative intervention by enabling holders to directly control their payment instruments through automated remote access. Holders can enable, disable, or check instrument status independently through communication devices, completely removing the time-consuming human intervention step from the security response process.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of customer service representative intervention with an automated electronic system. The physical action of calling and speaking to a representative is substituted with automated electronic communication signals transmitted through communication devices, dramatically reducing response time while maintaining security effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If direct control is given to payment vehicle holders, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases due to remote access systems

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveholder controlVSAvoidsystem architecture

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces communication devices as intermediaries between holders and payment instrument processing systems. These intermediary devices facilitate remote control and status checking without requiring complex direct integration between holder devices and payment systems, simplifying the overall architecture while enabling direct holder control.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20260111879A1Payment vehicle with on and off function

Publication Date: 2026.04.23 WELLS FARGO BANK NA

AI summary

A computer system and method for enabling or disabling a payment vehicle at the request of a payment card holder from a remote device. The computer system comprises a computer having memory and a processor for processing input data received from a remote device. The input data comprises an instruction executable by the processor in a form of a text message or electronic mail received from the remote device, with the instruction to enable or disable a payment card of a payment card holder by changing the status of the payment card. An interactive remote interface computer software application is provided to the payment card holder for use on the remote or other device.