Payment Device Cloned Card Detection via Image Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current technologies do not effectively detect cloned payment cards, relying on attributes like location and transaction amount, which fail to identify suspicious cards, especially blank or re-programmed cards, leading to potential fraudulent transactions.

Innovation Solution

A payment device equipped with on-board circuitry and machine learning capabilities to analyze images of payment cards in real-time, generating a characterization score to determine if a card is suspicious, and alerting financial institutions to prevent fraudulent transactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current fraud detection technologies rely on transaction attributes like location and amount, then the detection system is simple to implement, but it fails to detect cloned payment cards effectively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection accuracyVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the fraud detection process into multiple independent analysis components: image capture module, image processing module, feature extraction module, and characterization scoring module. Each module handles a specific aspect of card verification, allowing the complex detection task to be divided into manageable parts that can be processed independently and combined for final fraud determination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from analyzing traditional transactional dimensions (location, amount) to a new dimensional approach by capturing and analyzing visual characteristics of the payment card itself. This includes examining physical features, patterns, colors, and structural properties of the card that are difficult to clone, thereby adding a new dimension of verification beyond conventional transaction metadata.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If image analysis is performed on all payment cards, then cloned cards can be detected, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecloned card detection capabilityVSAvoidtransaction processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial image analysis by focusing only on critical card features and characteristics that are most indicative of cloning. Rather than analyzing every pixel or detail of the card image, the system extracts and analyzes only the most discriminative features (such as security patterns, color distributions, and structural elements), achieving effective detection with reduced processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary image capture and analysis before the actual transaction is authorized. By pre-processing and pre-evaluating card characteristics during the initial card insertion or presentation phase, the system prepares fraud detection results in advance, allowing for rapid transaction processing once the preliminary analysis is complete.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If machine learning models are used to analyze card images, then detection accuracy improves, but computational resources and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuspicious card identification accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs lightweight machine learning models that can be deployed on standard payment terminal hardware without requiring expensive specialized processors. These models are optimized to run efficiently on available resources, using simplified algorithms and reduced model complexity to achieve adequate detection accuracy while minimizing computational overhead and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The system adjusts model parameters and analysis thresholds dynamically based on transaction risk levels and available computational resources. By changing parameters such as analysis depth, model complexity, and confidence thresholds, the system can balance detection accuracy with resource consumption, using more intensive analysis only when necessary based on initial risk assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12307464B2Detecting cloned payment cards
Publication Date: 2025.05.20 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US12307464B2 patent drawing
  • US12307464B2 patent drawing
  • US12307464B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the disclosure relate to a payment device to detect real-time suspicious payment cards. Prior to a transaction, a payment device detects suspicious payment cards based on captured images of the payment card. An alert may be generated upon detection of any suspicious or fraudulent payment card. In some arrangements, the payment device may utilize machine learning models or machine learning capabilities to detect suspicious payment cards. A characterization score may be generated and used to determine if a payment card is suspicious. The characterization scores may be updated based on different card issuer criteria and transaction use of each payment card.