Payment Fraud Detection via Biometric Capture

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing prevalence of fraudulent transactions in modern payment systems, particularly with contactless and online payments, poses a significant challenge for financial institutions to effectively deter and prevent unauthorized use of stolen or compromised payment devices.

Innovation Solution

A method that involves receiving a payment request over a network, comparing the unique identifier of the payment device with a list of compromised devices, and issuing an instruction to capture a distinguishing characteristic of the person making the payment request if a match is found, using cameras integrated with Point of Sale terminals or online merchant systems to capture visual, audio, or biometric data for identification purposes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If sophisticated fraud detection techniques are used to identify and stop fraudulent transactions, then successful fraudulent transactions are reduced, but the complexity of the payment system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection effectivenessVSAvoidpayment system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by capturing characteristics of persons making payment requests before the transaction is completed. When a payment request is detected, the system proactively captures biometric or visual data of the person, stores it, and compares it later during authorization. This preliminary capture of data allows for more effective fraud detection without adding complexity to the core payment processing system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary characteristic capture and storage system that acts as a mediator between the payment request and the fraud detection process. Instead of directly analyzing payment data, the system uses captured person characteristics (biometric data, images) as an intermediary layer for verification. This intermediary mechanism enhances fraud detection reliability while keeping the payment system architecture relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If payment devices are cancelled immediately upon detecting fraudulent activity, then further fraudulent transactions are prevented, but legitimate transactions from compromised devices may be blocked

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud prevention effectivenessVSAvoidtransaction processing smoothness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where captured characteristics are stored and compared against future payment requests. Instead of immediately cancelling payment devices upon detecting potential fraud, the system continuously monitors by comparing new payment requests against the stored characteristics database. This feedback loop allows the system to distinguish between fraudulent and legitimate use of compromised devices, preventing false positives while maintaining fraud prevention effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary capture and storage of person characteristics before any fraud determination is made. This preliminary action creates a reference database that enables later verification without immediately blocking transactions. The system has already captured the necessary verification data in advance, allowing for smooth transaction processing while maintaining the ability to detect and prevent fraud through subsequent comparison.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If deterrence measures are implemented to reduce attempted fraudulent transactions, then the number of successful fraud cases decreases, but the overall fraud detection workload increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud reduction effectivenessVSAvoidprocessing time per transaction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service fraud detection by automatically capturing, storing, and comparing person characteristics without requiring manual intervention. The characteristic capture system operates autonomously, and the comparison process is automated, allowing the system to handle fraud detection independently. This self-service approach reduces the time and resources needed for manual fraud analysis while maintaining effective fraud reduction through continuous automated monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP3879478A1A method, computer program and apparatus
Publication Date: 2021.09.15 MASTERCARD INT INC
  • EP3879478A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3879478A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3879478A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method is described. This method comprises: receiving a payment request over a network, the payment request including a unique identifier which identifies a payment device making the payment request; comparing the unique identifier with a list of at least one unique identifier, each unique identifier being associated with a payment device meeting a predetermined criterion; and, in the event of a positive comparison; issuing an instruction over the network to capture a characteristic of the person making the payment request.