Payment Card Fraud Visualization System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional fraud detection systems rely heavily on transaction scores and expert rules, but lack effective visualization tools to aid analysts in making accurate decisions, especially when cardholders cannot be contacted or when fraud patterns change rapidly.

Innovation Solution

A visualization system that generates intuitive graphical representations of transaction data, including short-term and long-term histories, fraud patterns, and cardholder profiles, using a database to store relevant data and provide interactive graphical user interfaces for analysts to assess suspicious accounts and make informed decisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If conventional fraud detection systems use transaction scores and expert rules, then fraud detection can be automated, but analysts lack effective visualization tools to aid accurate decisions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection automationVSAvoidanalyst decision-making ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces visualization tools as an intermediary between the automated fraud detection system and the analyst. These tools include graphical displays of transaction patterns, cardholder profiles, and fraud indicators that mediate the decision-making process, allowing analysts to effectively evaluate automated scores and rules while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical review processes with computer-based visualization systems. Instead of manually reviewing transaction data, analysts use graphical interfaces that automatically present processed information, patterns, and insights, substituting manual mechanical analysis with automated visual presentation systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Device complexity

If analysts review transaction data without visualization tools, then system complexity is reduced, but fraud detection accuracy and speed decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidfraud detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms one-dimensional transaction data into multi-dimensional visual representations. Graphical interfaces display transaction patterns across multiple dimensions including time, amount, location, and merchant category, allowing analysts to perceive fraud indicators that would be difficult to detect in raw data while maintaining manageable system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses color-coded visual indicators to represent different fraud risk levels and transaction characteristics. Color changes provide immediate visual cues about transaction anomalies, fraud patterns, and risk assessments, enhancing detection accuracy without significantly increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

3Measurement precision

If analysts contact cardholders for every suspicious transaction, then fraud verification accuracy improves, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud verification accuracyVSAvoidcase processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by using visualization tools to pre-screen and prioritize suspicious transactions before analyst review. The system presents only the most critical cases requiring cardholder contact, while allowing analysts to make decisions on lower-risk cases based on visualized data alone, reducing overall time loss while maintaining verification accuracy for high-risk cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary analysis and visualization of transaction data before analyst review. The system pre-processes data to identify and highlight fraud indicators, transaction patterns, and risk factors, allowing analysts to quickly assess cases and determine whether cardholder contact is necessary, thereby reducing unnecessary contact time while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Ease of manufacture

If fraud detection systems rely on historical data only, then model training is simplified, but adaptability to new fraud patterns decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel training easeVSAvoidfraud pattern adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where analyst decisions and confirmed fraud cases are fed back into the system to continuously improve detection models. The visualization system presents both historical data and real-time transaction patterns, allowing the system to adapt to new fraud patterns while maintaining the simplicity of historical data-based model training through incremental learning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11380171B2Visualization for payment card transaction fraud analysis
Publication Date: 2022.07.05 FAIR ISAAC & CO INC
  • US11380171B2 patent drawing
  • US11380171B2 patent drawing
  • US11380171B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method and system for visualizing card transaction fraud analysis is presented. Transaction data and account data related to one or more payment card accounts is stored in a database. The transaction data includes a fraud score. A computer processor generates one or more of a plurality of visualizations of activity of at least one suspicious account from the one or more payment card accounts for display in a graphical user interface, each of the plurality of visualizations providing at least a graphical representation of the transaction data and which is selectable from a menu provided by the computer processor in the graphical user interface. The visualizations assist in case judgment of the one or more payment cards.