Payment Hub System Dynamic Routing Integration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current financial payment processing systems in the US and internationally are inefficient and costly, as they are based on traditional product silos that do not account for customer or financial institution needs in terms of timeliness, cost, and risk, and lack integration across different payment types and channels.

Innovation Solution

A comprehensive payment hub system that dynamically determines and arranges payment processes based on input channels, payment types, and attributes, allowing for serial, parallel, or combined processing, and adjusts during processing based on outcomes, to optimize payment routing and processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional product silo routing is used, then each payment type has dedicated processing logic and hardware, but the system lacks integration across different payment types and channels, resulting in inefficiency and high cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration across payment typesVSAvoidseparate systems for each payment type
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple separate payment processing systems into a single integrated payment hub that can handle various payment types (paper, image, electronic, wire, ACH) through a unified architecture. The payment hub consolidates previously siloed processing logic and hardware into one system, enabling cross-payment-type integration while maintaining specialized processing capabilities through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The payment hub is designed as a universal system capable of processing multiple payment types through a single interface. It implements multi-functional processing logic that can adapt to different payment formats and routing requirements, allowing one system to perform the functions previously requiring separate dedicated systems for each payment type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If pre-dispositioned routing is used, then payments are assigned to specific channels before transmission, but the system does not account for customer needs in terms of timeliness, cost, and risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer choice in payment routingVSAvoiddynamic routing decision system
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic routing that adjusts payment processing based on real-time conditions and customer preferences. The system evaluates multiple factors including timeliness requirements, cost considerations, and risk profiles to determine optimal routing decisions. This dynamic approach replaces static pre-dispositioned routing with adaptive decision-making that responds to varying customer needs and system conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The routing system incorporates feedback mechanisms that consider customer preferences, payment attributes, and system performance data to continuously optimize routing decisions. The system learns from processing outcomes and adjusts routing strategies to better satisfy customer requirements for timeliness, cost, and risk management while improving overall system efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If separate product silos are used, then specific logic processing and hardware are required for each payment type, but processing efficiency and cost-effectiveness are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayment processing efficiencyVSAvoidcost efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the payment processing system into modular functional components within the payment hub, where each module handles specific processing tasks that can be dynamically allocated based on payment type and routing requirements. This segmentation allows efficient resource utilization by activating only the necessary processing components for each transaction, improving productivity while reducing wasted computational resources and costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8606705B2Systems, methods and computer program products for managing payment processes in a comprehensive payment hub system
Publication Date: 2013.12.10 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US8606705B2 patent drawing
  • US8606705B2 patent drawing
  • US8606705B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and computer program products are provided for managing the processing of a financial payment and, more specifically managing the processing of a financial payment in a comprehensive payment hub environment that provides for payment processing, including payment route determination, irrespective of the payment input channel. In accordance with embodiments herein disclosed, managing the processing of the payment includes automatically determining the payment processes and automatically determining the arrangement of the payment processes. As such, the methods, systems, and computer program products herein described provide for an efficient and cost-effective approach to processing payments.