Payment Option Selection System with Financial Return Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users face difficulty in accurately selecting payment options that maximize rewards for transactions due to the complexity of various promotions associated with different payment methods, leading to suboptimal reward gains.

Innovation Solution

A system determines financial return scores for multiple payment options based on associated financial account information and transaction data, allowing for the selection of the payment option with the highest return score for each transaction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If users manually evaluate multiple payment options and their associated promotions, then they can potentially maximize rewards, but the complexity and time required for selection increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereward optimization accuracyVSAvoidselection process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically calculates financial return scores for multiple payment options by retrieving promotion data, transaction data, and account information, then presents the optimized selection to the user without requiring manual evaluation of complex promotion terms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The financial system acts as an intermediary between the user and multiple financial institutions, consolidating promotion information from various sources and processing it through a unified scoring mechanism to simplify the user's decision-making process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If users manually evaluate multiple payment options and their associated promotions, then they can potentially maximize rewards, but the time required for selection increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereward optimization accuracyVSAvoidselection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-loads and caches promotion data from multiple financial institutions before the user needs to make a selection, so that when a transaction is initiated, the financial return scores can be calculated and presented almost immediately without requiring real-time data gathering

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The automated scoring system performs the time-consuming evaluation of multiple payment options and promotions in the background, delivering the optimized selection to the user ready for immediate use

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If the system consolidates multiple payment options with different promotions into a single selection interface, then the ease of operation improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayment selection easeVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The financial system serves as an intermediary layer between the user's device and multiple financial institutions, handling the complexity of data retrieval, normalization, and scoring in the background while presenting a simple unified interface to the user

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system separates the complex backend processing (data retrieval from multiple institutions, promotion evaluation, score calculation) from the simple frontend interface (presenting ranked payment options), allowing each layer to be optimized independently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11978080B2Method and system for selecting payment option for transaction
Publication Date: 2024.05.07 YAHOO ASSETS LLC
  • US11978080B2 patent drawing
  • US11978080B2 patent drawing
  • US11978080B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One or more computing devices, systems, and/or methods are provided. In an example, financial account information associated with a plurality of payment options may be determined. First financial account information of the financial account information is associated with a first payment option of the plurality of payment options. The first financial account information may be indicative of a first rewards profile associated with transactions performed using the first payment option. A request associated with a transaction may be received. A plurality of financial return scores associated with the plurality of payment options may be determined based upon the financial account information and transaction information associated with the transaction. A first financial return score of the plurality of financial return scores may be associated with the first payment option. The first payment option of the plurality of payment options may be selected for the transaction based upon the plurality of financial return scores.