Payment Processing System with Dynamic Payer Status Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current electronic payment systems face challenges in maximizing user registration while protecting payment service providers from financial risk, as they often require credit history validation, are 'all or nothing' in registration, and do not offer varying levels of service or privilege, deterring potential users with poor or non-existent credit histories and those unwilling to disclose credit information.

Innovation Solution

A method that allows users to be assigned different payer statuses based on credit risk assessment, enabling immediate registration and payment direction within a single online session, with options for varying levels of service and privilege, and the ability to change statuses based on payment history or sponsor relationships, without requiring users to disclose extensive credit information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If credit history validation is required for user registration, then provider financial risk is reduced, but user registration quantity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprovider financial risk protectionVSAvoiduser registration quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments users into different categories (registered users with full privileges and unregistered users with limited privileges) based on their credit risk profiles. This allows the system to serve high-risk users without exposing the provider to unacceptable financial risk, thereby increasing overall user registration quantity while maintaining reliability for the provider.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of user privileges from binary (registered/unregistered) to a spectrum of service levels. Unregistered users are granted limited privileges (e.g., payment amount caps, restricted payee selection) that scale with their credit risk profile, enabling registration of more users while controlling provider exposure through parameterized privilege adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If extensive credit information disclosure is required, then provider credit risk assessment accuracy improves, but ease of operation for users deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecredit risk assessment accuracyVSAvoiduser registration convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by requiring only the minimum necessary credit information from users to perform risk assessment. Instead of demanding extensive credit histories, the system collects sufficient data (e.g., basic identity verification, limited financial information) to categorize users into risk segments, thereby maintaining assessment accuracy while improving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If all-or-nothing registration is implemented, then provider control over financial risk is maintained, but adaptability of service levels decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprovider financial risk controlVSAvoidservice level variation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic service levels that adjust based on user behavior and credit risk assessment. Users start with limited privileges and can earn expanded access as they demonstrate reliable payment patterns. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to maintain risk control while providing versatile service levels that evolve with user trust.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes service parameters (payment limits, approved payees, transaction speeds) based on user risk profiles and behavior. This parameterized approach enables fine-grained control over financial risk while providing adaptability in service levels, allowing the same platform to serve both high-risk and low-risk users with appropriate customization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple payer statuses are assigned, then adaptability of payment options increases, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayment option flexibilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments payer statuses into distinct categories (e.g., unregistered, registered, verified) with clearly defined privilege sets. This segmentation approach manages complexity by creating discrete, manageable status levels rather than continuous variations, making the system easier to implement while still providing adaptable payment options for different user types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS7953660B2Method and system for payment processing
Publication Date: 2011.05.31 CHECKFREE SERVICES CORP
  • US7953660B2 patent drawing
  • US7953660B2 patent drawing
  • US7953660B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides a method, system, and article of manufacture for providing payment services on a network. Information identifying a network user is received. The network user is assigned a payer status. A request to make a payment to a payee on behalf of the network user is received. If a first payer status is assigned to the network user, the payment will be made no matter the identity of the payee. If a second payer status is assigned to the network user, the payment will only be made if the payee is one of a group of payees that is not determined by the network user. With the second payer status, the network user can only direct payments to the group of payees. The payer status can be changed from one payer status to another payer status.