Payment Platform Exception Handling via Automated Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In the context of electronic funds disbursement, payment processors face challenges in matching bank items with payment transaction records, leading to unresolved exceptions that require laborious and time-sensitive remediation, often resulting in disruptive consequences such as unreturnable funds and scrutiny from creditors.

Innovation Solution

A payment system and method that initiates a payment process, records funds transfers, and performs a matching process to identify associations between payment records and item records, exposing exception records via a network interface and receiving response codes to facilitate the identification of associations, thereby enabling efficient resolution of matching failures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual matching of bank items with payment transaction records is performed, then matching precision can be improved, but processing time and labor requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematching precisionVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automated self-matching of bank items with payment transaction records through computer-executed algorithms that automatically compare account numbers, dates, and amounts, eliminating the need for manual intervention while maintaining high matching precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical matching processes with electronic computer systems that automatically process and match bank items against payment transaction records, significantly reducing processing time while maintaining accuracy through systematic algorithmic comparison

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If exception handling processes are made more complex to handle all edge cases, then reliability improves, but operational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexception handling reliabilityVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The exception handling process is segmented into distinct categories (e.g., unmatched bank items, unmatched payment transactions, partial matches) with specific predetermined actions assigned to each category, making the complex handling process more manageable and systematic while maintaining high reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts matching parameters such as tolerance thresholds for date ranges, account number formats, and amount variations to accommodate different exception scenarios, enabling reliable handling of edge cases without requiring overly complex fixed rules

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If automated matching algorithms are simplified for faster processing, then productivity improves, but measurement precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidmatching accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The matching algorithm performs multiple comparison criteria simultaneously (account numbers, dates, amounts, reference numbers) in a single automated pass, achieving both high productivity through automation and high precision through comprehensive multi-factor verification without requiring sequential manual review

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Reliability

If exception records are made more detailed to facilitate accurate remediation, then reliability improves, but information processing burden increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremediation accuracyVSAvoidinformation processing burden
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and isolates only the critical exception details (bank item identifier, payment transaction record identifier, mismatched fields, suggested corrections) into structured exception records, providing sufficient information for accurate remediation while avoiding unnecessary data complexity and reducing processing burden

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20240233007A1System and method for improved exception handling by a payment platform
Publication Date: 2024.07.11 GLOBAL HLDG LLC
  • US20240233007A1 patent drawing
  • US20240233007A1 patent drawing
  • US20240233007A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In an illustrative embodiment, systems and methods by which a payment system may respond to its failure to identify an association between a payment record and an item record include recording exception type information describing a potential reason for the failure of such association to be identified. An item record may record information about an electronic payment instrument initiated by a third party, by which funds were transferred from a disbursement account maintained by an operator of the payment system to the aforementioned third party. A payment record may record information concerning a payment scheduled to be initiated by the payment system. In response to such a failure, a potential association between the aforementioned item record and a payment record may be recorded. Information from the item record, along with the exception type information, are exposed to a network via an application interface.