Payment Profile Migration Error Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Merchants face challenges in migrating payment profiles from one third-party service provider to another, especially when the file formats used by the service providers differ, leading to compatibility issues and security risks during the transition.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for payment profile migration that involves a migration service provider, which generates new payment profiles and tokens in a different file format, performs payment transaction tests, and assesses security risks, ensuring secure and compatible data transfer between service providers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If payment profiles are migrated from one service provider to another using different file formats, then the merchant can switch to a different service provider, but compatibility issues and data loss may occur during the migration process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice provider switching capabilityVSAvoiddata integrity during migration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a migration service provider as an intermediary between the original service provider and the target service provider. This intermediary receives payment profiles in the first file format, converts them to the second file format, and transmits them to the target service provider. The intermediary ensures data integrity by maintaining accurate mappings between different file format structures and handling format-specific requirements, thereby resolving the contradiction between service provider adaptability and data reliability during migration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by transforming the file format parameters of payment profiles during migration. The migration service provider modifies structural parameters, data field parameters, and formatting parameters to convert profiles from the first file format to the second file format. This systematic parameter transformation ensures that data integrity is maintained while adapting to different service provider requirements, resolving the contradiction between format adaptability and data reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If payment profiles are converted between different file formats, then compatibility with the new service provider is achieved, but complexity of the migration process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefile format compatibilityVSAvoidmigration process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The migration service provider acts as an intermediary that absorbs and manages the complexity of file format conversion. Instead of requiring the merchant or target service provider to handle complex conversion logic, the intermediary service provider implements the conversion infrastructure, maintaining format-specific knowledge and conversion rules internally. This reduces the perceived complexity for end users while achieving comprehensive file format compatibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The migration service provider implements a universal conversion system that can handle multiple file formats through a single platform. The system maintains mappings between different file format structures and provides a unified interface for migration operations. This multi-functional approach achieves broad file format compatibility without proportionally increasing process complexity, as the conversion logic is consolidated within the intermediary service.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If payment profiles are migrated without proper testing, then migration speed is increased, but security risks and transaction errors may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemigration speedVSAvoidtransaction security and accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary testing actions before completing the migration process. The migration service provider performs test transactions using migrated payment profiles to verify data integrity, format correctness, and transaction security. This preliminary validation ensures that migrated profiles function correctly in the target service provider environment before full migration is finalized, resolving the contradiction between migration speed and transaction reliability through advance verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The migration process incorporates feedback mechanisms where test results from trial transactions are analyzed and used to refine the migration conversion rules. If errors are detected during testing, the feedback loop triggers adjustments to the conversion mappings or processes. This feedback-driven approach ensures high transaction security and accuracy while maintaining efficient migration speed, as corrections are made systematically rather than through repeated manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10846768B2Error response corresponding to a payment profile migration
Publication Date: 2020.11.24 PAYPAL INC
  • US10846768B2 patent drawing
  • US10846768B2 patent drawing
  • US10846768B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system may transmit a first indication to initiate a transfer of a first set of payment profiles from a first computer of a first payment service provider to a second computer of a second payment service provider. The system may cause the second computer to execute, in response to the first indication, a profile migration to generate a new set of payment profiles corresponding to the first set of payment profiles. The system may receive, from the second computer, an error indication corresponding to the profile migration. The system may select, in response to the error indication, an action from a set of available actions to perform with respect to the profile migration. The system may cause the second computer to execute the action to transition the profile migration from a first state to a second state.