Payment Instrument Provisioning Using Transaction-Based Authentication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing payment instrument provisioning methods are vulnerable to unauthorized provisioning due to the effectiveness of social engineering techniques, allowing unauthorised users to provision payment instruments without the knowledge or consent of the authorised user, leading to potential fraud.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for authenticating a request to provision a payment instrument onto an electronic device, involving secure data entry, server validation, and response messaging to ensure authorized provisioning, including the use of a secure data entry device and server to verify secure data and generate authorization data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional manual entry methods are used for provisioning payment instruments, then the process is simple and quick, but security is compromised as unauthorised users can provision instruments through social engineering

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity of provisioning processVSAvoidcomplexity of provisioning system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A secure data entry device is introduced as an intermediary between the user and the provisioning system. This device includes a processor and storage unit that verify secure data (such as PINs or biometric data) before allowing provisioning to proceed. The intermediary validates user identity and authorisation, preventing unauthorised provisioning while maintaining a streamlined user experience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If additional verification steps are implemented to prevent social engineering, then security is improved, but the provisioning process becomes more time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication accuracyVSAvoidprovisioning time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The secure data entry device performs preliminary verification of secure data before the provisioning process begins. By validating authentication credentials in advance, the system ensures that only authorised users can initiate provisioning, eliminating the need for repeated verification steps during the actual provisioning process and thus reducing overall time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the secure data entry device provides immediate confirmation of authentication status. This allows users to understand the verification process better and reduces unnecessary repeated attempts, thereby reducing time loss while maintaining high authentication accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If manual entry of payment instrument data is required, then the process is straightforward, but it increases vulnerability to data theft and social engineering

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of data entryVSAvoidvulnerability to social engineering
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The manual mechanical process of reading and entering payment instrument data is replaced with an automated secure data entry device. This device uses processors and storage units to automatically verify secure data such as PINs or biometric identifiers, eliminating the need for manual data entry while maintaining ease of operation through automated interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20250363492A1Systems and methods for provisioning a payment instrument
Publication Date: 2025.11.27 WORLDPAY LTD
  • US20250363492A1 patent drawing
  • US20250363492A1 patent drawing
  • US20250363492A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates generally to the provisioning of payment instruments onto electronic devices such as a mobile telephone, tablet, laptop or wearable, and in particular to securely provisioning payment instrument for which authorisation for the provisioning must be provided by a payment instrument issuer. A first embodiment is provided in which data that is generated during a transaction is received by an electronic device and transmitted from the electronic device to a server associated with an acquirer. The data received from the electronic device is compared to the data generated during the transaction and, if these match, provisioning is authorised. A second embodiment is provided in which a server associated with an acquirer generates an identification message that is separate from but based on a response message associated with a transaction, and provisioning is authorised or declined based on the identification message.