Payment Rail Selection for Near-Real-Time Cross-Border Payouts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing payment systems suffer from latency issues, particularly in cross-border transactions, which can hinder smaller merchants and service providers from receiving payments promptly, leading to inventory and operational challenges.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilizes a network of payment rails to determine the fastest available payment rail for executing payouts based on specific rules and user account information, enabling near real-time transactions by leveraging a network of funding agencies and optimizing transaction paths.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If traditional payment processing systems are used, then transaction reliability is maintained, but payout speed deteriorates due to latency in payment settlements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayout speedVSAvoidpayment settlement time
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-validating payment information, pre-selecting optimal payment rails, and pre-arranging funding sources before the actual payout is requested. This allows the payout to be executed immediately when funds are available, eliminating post-transaction processing delays that occur in traditional systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The payment processing system is segmented into independent modular components including payment rail selection module, validation module, execution module, and funding agency coordination module. Each segment operates autonomously and can process different aspects of the payout simultaneously, reducing overall processing time while maintaining reliability through specialized handling of each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Speed

If multiple payment rails are evaluated to find the fastest option, then payout speed improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayout speedVSAvoidpayment rail selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary payment processing platform that sits between the user and multiple payment rails. This intermediary automatically evaluates available payment rails, selects the optimal one based on speed and reliability criteria, and manages the complexity of coordinating between different funding agencies and payment networks, shielding users from the underlying complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes evaluation parameters for payment rail selection based on real-time conditions such as current processing speeds, availability, costs, and reliability metrics of different payment rails. This allows the system to adapt to changing conditions and select the fastest available option without requiring complex manual configuration or decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If real-time fund verification is implemented, then payout reliability improves, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayout reliabilityVSAvoidverification time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs fund verification as a preliminary action during account setup or before funds are deposited, rather than at the moment of payout request. Once verified, the fund availability is cached and can be quickly confirmed during payout operations, ensuring reliability without adding verification time to each transaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops that monitor fund availability, payment rail status, and transaction outcomes in real-time. This feedback mechanism allows the system to proactively detect and resolve potential issues before they affect payout reliability, while maintaining fast processing through automated real-time updates rather than batch verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12456102B2System and method for implementing fast payouts
Publication Date: 2025.10.28 PAYPAL INC
  • US12456102B2 patent drawing
  • US12456102B2 patent drawing
  • US12456102B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for implementing a fast payment is described. A request to execute a payout to a payee account is received, where the request includes information about the payout. At least one payment rail available for the requested payout is determined from a plurality of payment rails based on the included information. Rules associated with each of the at least one payment rail are identified. A fastest payment rail is determined from the at least one payment rail for executing the payout based on the identified rules and the information about the payout. The payout is then executed over the determined fastest payment rail.