Payment Means Recommendation System Using Future Consumption Pattern Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users face difficulty in utilizing payment means benefits due to the diversity of offers, as existing recommendation technologies only consider current consumption patterns and not future patterns, leading to unsuitable benefits and information asymmetry for vulnerable groups like the elderly.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that acquire payment information, analyze consumption patterns, specify user groups, predict future consumption patterns, and recommend personalized payment means by referring to group attributes, ensuring both current and future patterns are considered and addressing information asymmetry.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If only current consumption pattern is used to recommend payment means, then the recommendation system is simple and fast, but the accuracy of benefit suitability is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of benefit suitabilityVSAvoidcomplexity of recommendation system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by predicting future consumption patterns before making payment means recommendations. This involves analyzing historical payment information, identifying consumption patterns, forecasting future behavior, and pre-determining suitable payment means with benefits that will be relevant when the user actually uses them, rather than waiting until after consumption occurs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The recommendation system transitions from static current-pattern-based recommendations to dynamic future-pattern-based recommendations. The system continuously updates consumption pattern predictions based on new payment information and changing user behavior, making the recommendations adaptive and evolving over time to maintain high accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If diverse payment means benefits are offered, then user benefit options increase, but user ability to figure out suitable payment means decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediversity of payment means benefitsVSAvoidease of selecting payment means
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring user payment information and consumption patterns, analyzing the effectiveness of recommended payment means, and using this feedback to refine future predictions and recommendations. This creates a closed-loop system that learns from user behavior to improve recommendation accuracy while maintaining diversity of options

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The recommendation system operates as a self-service mechanism that automatically analyzes user payment information, identifies consumption patterns, predicts future behavior, and generates personalized payment means recommendations without requiring active user effort. Users simply need to provide payment information, and the system handles the complex analysis and recommendation generation autonomously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If manual information input is required for payment recommendation, then information accuracy may be high, but information asymmetry for vulnerable groups increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of payment informationVSAvoidinformation asymmetry for vulnerable groups
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary mechanism that automatically collects and processes payment information from various sources (payment gateways, transaction systems, financial institutions) without requiring direct user input. This intermediary layer bridges the information gap by gathering data systematically and processing it through pattern analysis algorithms, ensuring accurate recommendations even for users who cannot manually provide information

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20240185255A1Method, system, and non-transitory computer-readable recording medium for recommending payment means
Publication Date: 2024.06.06 BANK X INC
  • US20240185255A1 patent drawing
  • US20240185255A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a method for recommending a payment means, including acquiring payment information of at least one payment means associated with a user, analyzing a consumption pattern of the user by referring to the acquired payment information, specifying a group associated with the user by referring to the consumption pattern, predicting a future consumption pattern of the user by referring to attributes of the specified group, and determining a payment means to be recommended to the user by referring to a result of the predicting.