Payment Recommendation Interface for Rewards Rule Complexity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Consumers face difficulty in determining the most efficient payment method to maximize rewards and benefits from multiple credit cards with different rules and benefits, often leading to missed opportunities due to lack of sophistication and tracking capabilities.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing an application programming interface, database, and server to analyze past transactions, generate payment analytics, and recommend the most beneficial payment method at the point of sale, which can include virtual numbers to enhance security and prevent fraud.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If consumers use multiple credit cards with different rewards rules and benefits, then they can potentially maximize their rewards and benefits, but it becomes difficult to track and determine which payment method is most efficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverewards maximizationVSAvoidtracking complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary system (payment recommendation system) that acts as a mediator between the consumer and multiple credit cards. This system automatically tracks transactions, analyzes rewards rules, and recommends optimal payment methods, eliminating the need for consumers to manually track and compare multiple card benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by automatically monitoring and comparing rewards across multiple credit cards without requiring consumer intervention. The system autonomously tracks spending patterns, calculates potential rewards, and provides recommendations, allowing consumers to benefit from multiple cards without the tracking burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If consumers manually track and analyze rewards rules across multiple credit cards, then they can determine the most efficient payment method, but this requires a level of sophistication and focus that the typical consumer doesn't have

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverewards optimization accuracyVSAvoiduser effort
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary system (payment recommendation system) that acts as a mediator between the consumer and multiple credit cards. This system automatically tracks transactions, analyzes rewards rules, and recommends optimal payment methods, eliminating the need for consumers to manually track and compare multiple card benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of tracking and analyzing rewards with an automated computational system. The system uses algorithms to automatically process transaction data, compare rewards structures, and determine optimal payment methods, substituting human cognitive effort with automated intelligence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If consumers do not fully understand the rules or read the fine print of credit card rewards, then they can avoid the complexity of tracking, but they miss out on potential benefits

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesimplicityVSAvoidrewards earned
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by automatically monitoring and comparing rewards across multiple credit cards without requiring consumer intervention. The system autonomously tracks spending patterns, calculates potential rewards, and provides recommendations, allowing consumers to benefit from multiple cards without the tracking burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides continuous feedback to consumers about potential rewards from different payment methods. By analyzing spending patterns and comparing rewards structures in real-time, the system informs consumers of the most beneficial payment options, enabling them to earn maximum rewards without needing to understand complex rules themselves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12555086B2Systems and methods for a user interface for making recommendations
Publication Date: 2026.02.17 CAPITAL ONE SERVICES LLC
  • US12555086B2 patent drawing
  • US12555086B2 patent drawing
  • US12555086B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system includes an application programming interface, a database, and a server. The application programming interface can make recommendations to a user at a point of sale to display a recommended payment method from a set of payment methods associated with the user. The database can store past transactions for each payment method in the set of payment methods. The server can generate payment analytics by analyzing the past transactions in the database for each payment method. The server can determine potential benefits available to the user. The server can determine the recommended payment method by using the payment analytics and maximizing the potential benefits available to the user.