Payment Risk Model for Secure Fund Release

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current network-based commerce transaction systems lack efficient and secure payment mechanisms, leading to delayed payments to sellers and potential disputes due to the risk of fraudulent sellers and misrepresentation of products.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that generate a risk model based on seller-specific criteria to manage the release of funds from a holding account, ensuring timely and secure payments while mitigating fraud risks through a scoring algorithm and fraud prevention mechanisms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If funds are held in escrow until buyer approval, then buyer protection is improved, but payment speed to seller deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebuyer protectionVSAvoidpayment speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary risk assessment and seller verification before the transaction occurs. Sellers are pre-screened using risk models that evaluate their credentials, transaction history, and feedback ratings. This preliminary action allows the system to identify low-risk sellers in advance, enabling faster fund release while maintaining buyer protection through pre-established risk thresholds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the risk threshold parameters based on seller performance and transaction characteristics. For low-risk sellers with strong credentials and positive feedback, the system lowers the risk threshold, allowing faster fund release. For high-risk sellers, the threshold remains higher, requiring longer holding periods. This parameter adjustment resolves the contradiction by making payment speed conditional on verified risk levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If direct payment to seller is used, then payment speed is improved, but fraud risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayment speedVSAvoidfraud risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces a risk assessment intermediary that mediates between the buyer and seller. This intermediary evaluates seller credentials, transaction history, and risk factors before facilitating direct payment. The intermediary acts as a trust bridge, allowing fast direct payment to low-risk sellers while blocking or flagging high-risk transactions. This resolves the contradiction by filtering fraud risk through the intermediary assessment while maintaining payment speed for approved transactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary fraud risk assessment before enabling direct payment. Sellers undergo pre-verification of their credentials, business licenses, and transaction history. This preliminary action identifies and flags potential fraud risks in advance, allowing the system to enable fast direct payment only for verified low-risk sellers, thus achieving both speed and security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If risk assessment is performed, then fraud prevention is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud preventionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The risk assessment system is segmented into modular components: credential verification module, transaction history analysis module, feedback rating module, and risk scoring module. Each module independently evaluates specific risk factors and contributes to the overall risk score. This segmentation allows the system to perform comprehensive fraud prevention without creating a monolithic complex system, as each module can be developed, maintained, and adjusted independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically performs risk assessment without requiring manual intervention. The risk model autonomously evaluates seller credentials, analyzes transaction patterns, calculates risk scores, and makes funding decisions based on pre-set thresholds. This self-service automation reduces system complexity by eliminating manual review processes while maintaining robust fraud prevention through algorithmic assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10223676B2Release of funds based on criteria
Publication Date: 2019.03.05 PAYPAL INC
  • US10223676B2 patent drawing
  • US10223676B2 patent drawing
  • US10223676B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system to transfer payment to a seller of a network-based commerce transaction are described herein. The method includes performing a risk evaluation based on retrieved seller-specific data, and releasing funds from a holding account to the seller based on the risk evaluation.