Payment Terminal Fraud Detection via Attestation Tickets

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Payment terminals are vulnerable to fraudulent activities and tampering, with attackers attempting to access payment information, eavesdrop on signals, or modify communications, and counterfeit payment cards being used to bypass security measures.

Innovation Solution

Implementing an augmented tamper and fraud detection methodology that includes a trust routine within the payment platform, using trust commands to attest the security of the payment entity, generating an attestation ticket based on reliably measured data, and continuously validating the platform's integrity to ensure secure transactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional tamper switches or tamper meshes are used to detect physical access attempts, then basic security protection is provided, but sophisticated attackers can bypass these measures or perform attacks without physical access

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity protectionVSAvoidbypass capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical tamper detection systems (tamper switches, tamper meshes) with a logical validation system that uses software-based trust commands and attestation tickets to detect tampering. This substitution allows detection without physical access requirements, addressing the bypass capability issue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a payment processing system as an intermediary that receives trust commands from a trusted party, executes validation logic, and issues attestation tickets to payment terminals. This intermediary layer enables remote validation without requiring direct physical access to the terminal's tamper detection mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If payment terminals continuously monitor for tampering to improve security, then detection capability increases, but system complexity and processing overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetamper detectionVSAvoidvalidation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by having the payment terminal continuously execute trust commands and monitor for tampering conditions in the background, without requiring active validation requests for each transaction. The terminal maintains a current state of validation that can be quickly referenced during transactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback mechanisms where the payment terminal reports its validation state to the payment processing system, which then issues attestation tickets valid for a period of time. This feedback loop allows continuous monitoring while reducing the need for repeated validation checks during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If multiple validation checks are performed to ensure payment terminal security, then fraud detection accuracy improves, but transaction processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection accuracyVSAvoidtransaction processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs validation checks in advance by continuously executing trust commands and obtaining attestation tickets before transactions occur. The payment terminal maintains a current validation state that is pre-established, allowing rapid reference during transaction processing without repeating all validation checks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial validation by using attestation tickets that are valid for a period of time, reducing the need to perform complete validation checks for every transaction. The terminal can reference the pre-obtained validation state rather than re-executing all trust commands with each transaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10373167B2Logical validation of devices against fraud
Publication Date: 2019.08.06 BLOCK INC
  • US10373167B2 patent drawing
  • US10373167B2 patent drawing
  • US10373167B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein is a method and system to determine whether a payment terminal has been tampered with based on a comparison of attestation data received from the payment terminal. If the determination yields that the request has been approved, the terminal generates an attestation ticket having one or more validity conditions, wherein the validity conditions include expiration time that indicates the time after which the attestation ticket becomes invalid. The attestation ticket can be used as long as it is valid or until another trigger causes the ticket to be invalidated or regenerated.