Payment Information Validation via Image OCR and Data Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In online commerce, consumers frequently enter incorrect payment information, leading to rejected transactions that are costly and inconvenient for both consumers and merchants, and existing pre-authorization processes are time-consuming and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

A system that compares a first representation of payment information entered by a consumer with a second representation, such as an image of a value token, to validate the payment information, allowing for correction and fraud analysis if they do not match, and can be processed by either a merchant service provider or directly by the merchant.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If pre-authorization process is used to validate payment information, then transaction rejection rate is reduced, but processing time increases and convenience deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction acceptance rateVSAvoidvalidation processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs validation actions in advance by capturing an image of the payment instrument and extracting data from it before the actual transaction occurs. This preliminary data extraction and validation preparation reduces the need for time-consuming re-verification during the transaction process, thereby maintaining high transaction acceptance rates while reducing processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional manual pre-authorization processes with automated optical character recognition (OCR) technology to extract and validate payment information from images. This substitution of mechanical/manual verification with automated optical recognition systems significantly reduces processing time while maintaining validation accuracy and transaction acceptance rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If manual entry of payment information is used, then ease of operation is maintained, but errors increase leading to transaction rejections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayment information entry convenienceVSAvoidpayment information accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates an optical copy (image) of the payment instrument and uses automated recognition to extract data from this copy. This eliminates the need for manual typing while ensuring accuracy, as the data is directly captured from the source document through image processing and OCR technology.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

Manual entry of payment information is replaced with automated optical character recognition (OCR) systems that extract data directly from images of payment instruments. This substitution eliminates human typing errors while maintaining ease of operation, as the system automatically captures and processes the information without requiring manual input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If communication channels are used to transmit payment information, then ease of operation is improved, but data corruption may occur leading to validation failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayment information transmission convenienceVSAvoiddata transmission accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary validation by comparing the originally captured payment instrument image data with the transmitted data before final processing. This preliminary check detects and corrects potential data corruption from communication channels, ensuring data accuracy while maintaining the convenience of electronic transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the captured image data serves as a reference to verify the accuracy of transmitted payment information. If data corruption is detected during transmission, the system can request re-transmission or correction using the original image data as a reference, thereby maintaining data integrity while preserving transmission convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10769638B2Bank account number validation
Publication Date: 2020.09.08 VISA INTERNATIONAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION
  • US10769638B2 patent drawing
  • US10769638B2 patent drawing
  • US10769638B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for validating payment information for an online transaction is provided. A payment server can receive two representations of the same payment information. The payment information can be validated if it is determined that the two representations match. If there is no match, or the payment information is otherwise invalid, the payment information can be repaired based on a trusted representation of the payment information, such as stored payment information or an image of an associated value token. Payment information can be received via one or more communication channels, and can be provided by one or more consumer devices. A merchant service provider can validate payment information and handle transaction processing on behalf of a merchant.