Payment Verification Using Location and Account Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing payment verification methods, such as 'account+password' and 'account+password+SMS code' methods, are insufficient in ensuring the security of mobile payment processes, as they can be compromised by unauthorized access, leading to financial losses and inconvenience for legitimate users.

Innovation Solution

A payment verification method that includes verifying account information and geographical location information of a payer's terminal by matching it with pre-stored data, using a receiver access point's geographical location information to confirm the legitimacy of the payment operation, thereby enhancing security and preventing unauthorized transactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If 'account+password' verification method is used, then payment process is simple and fast, but security of payment process cannot be guaranteed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayment process simplicityVSAvoidpayment security
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The verification process is segmented into multiple independent stages: account verification, device identification verification, and geographical location verification. Each stage checks a different aspect of legitimacy, creating layered security without requiring complete re-verification at each step.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediary verification elements (device identification information and geographical location information) that mediate between the user's account credentials and the final payment authorization. These intermediaries provide additional validation layers that don't directly burden the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If 'account+password+SMS code' verification method is used, then payment security is improved, but security risks remain due to text message divulging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayment securityVSAvoidtext message fraud risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts the verification process from vulnerable communication channels (SMS messages) and relocates it to more secure channels. Device identification information and geographical location data are obtained through direct device communication and network location services rather than through text messages that can be intercepted.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system converts potentially harmful elements into beneficial verification factors. Instead of relying on SMS codes that can be stolen, the system uses the device's inherent identification information and location data - information that is difficult to replicate or steal - to create security advantages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Reliability

If multiple verification methods are implemented, then payment security is enhanced, but verification complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayment securityVSAvoidverification system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Device identification information and geographical location information are collected and stored in advance during device registration. This preliminary action eliminates the need for complex real-time verification procedures during actual payment transactions, as the verification data is already prepared and available.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system utilizes information that devices and networks provide automatically without requiring active user participation. Device identification information is obtained from the device itself, and geographical location information is obtained from network location services, reducing the operational burden on users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10460309B2Payment verification method, apparatus and system
Publication Date: 2019.10.29 CLOUD INTELLIGENCE ASSETS HOLDING (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD
  • US10460309B2 patent drawing
  • US10460309B2 patent drawing
  • US10460309B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, apparatuses and systems of payment verification are disclosed. A method includes receiving a request for connecting to a receiver access point (AP) from a terminal of a payer to be verified and geographical location information of the receiver AP, verifying whether account information included in the request matches with pre-stored payment account information; returning a verification result to the receiver AP; receiving a payer terminal geographical location information verification request from a payment server if the verification result indicates a match; verifying geographical location information of the terminal of the payer to be verified based on the geographical location information of the receiver AP; and returning a verification result of the payer terminal geographical location information verification request to the payment server. The method increases the security of a payment process and prevents a legitimate user from suffering financial losses and unnecessary troubles.