Enterprise Payroll Service Architecture via Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Enterprise software systems, particularly those with payroll functionality, face challenges in scalability and cost-effectiveness due to their complex architecture and distributed components across multiple hardware platforms, requiring a design that enables efficient reuse of software components and flexible deployment units.

Innovation Solution

A services architecture design that includes service operations, process components, and deployment units, allowing for scalable and cost-effective implementation by defining service interfaces for interaction between process components across different deployment units, and utilizing business objects and process agents for efficient data processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If enterprise software systems use distributed components across multiple hardware platforms, then the system can provide enterprise-level functionality and flexibility, but the architecture complexity increases and scalability becomes difficult to achieve

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenterprise-level functionalityVSAvoidarchitecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the enterprise software system into independent deployment units, each containing specific process components that can be deployed separately on different hardware platforms. This segmentation reduces architecture complexity by creating modular, self-contained units while maintaining enterprise-level functionality through their coordinated interaction via service interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates universal service interfaces that enable process components across different deployment units to interact through standardized protocols. This universality allows the system to maintain flexibility and adaptability across multiple hardware platforms while reducing the complexity of platform-specific integrations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If enterprise software systems use distributed components across multiple hardware platforms, then the system can provide flexible deployment options, but achieving scalability becomes challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment flexibilityVSAvoidscalability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the system into independent deployment units that can be deployed separately, the patent enables scalable growth. Each deployment unit can be independently scaled based on demand, allowing the system to grow progressively without requiring complete system redeployment, thus achieving both deployment flexibility and scalability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a nested architecture where process components are contained within deployment units, which in turn can be distributed across multiple hardware platforms. This nested structure allows for hierarchical scaling, where individual deployment units can be scaled independently while maintaining their place in the overall system hierarchy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Adaptability or versatility

If enterprise software systems use complex architecture with multiple components, then the system can provide comprehensive payroll functionality, but cost-effective implementation becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayroll functionalityVSAvoidimplementation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the payroll functionality into discrete process components that can be independently developed, tested, and deployed. This segmentation reduces implementation costs by allowing incremental development and deployment of payroll features, avoiding the need to implement and test the entire system at once.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses service interfaces as reusable templates that can be copied and applied across different deployment units. This copying approach reduces implementation costs by eliminating the need to create custom integration logic for each deployment unit, as the standardized service interfaces can be replicated and reused throughout the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS8671035B2Providing payroll software application as enterprise services
Publication Date: 2014.03.11 SAP SE
  • US8671035B2 patent drawing
  • US8671035B2 patent drawing
  • US8671035B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatus, including systems and computer program products, for a service architecture design that provides enterprise services having payroll functionality at the level of an enterprise application. The design includes a set of service operations, process components, and optionally deployment units. Suitable business objects are also described.