PBCH Decoding Module Blind Decoding False Alarms

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wireless communication systems face challenges in reliable decoding of broadcast channels due to interference, leading to false alarms and reduced accuracy in decoding control and data channels, especially in heterogeneous networks with femto and pico cells.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a PBCH decoding module that performs blind decoding until a successful cyclic redundancy check is achieved, comparing system information with previous frames, and selectively rejecting information based on discrepancies to improve decoding reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If blind decoding is performed on broadcast channels, then system information can be obtained, but false alarms increase and decoding reliability decreases due to interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem information acquisitionVSAvoiddecoding reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism by comparing decoded system information from the current radio frame with previously stored system information. The UE determines whether the decoded information is correct by checking for changes, and only updates when appropriate. This feedback loop reduces false alarms caused by interference while ensuring accurate system information acquisition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by storing system information from previously successfully decoded radio frames before attempting new decoding. This pre-stored information serves as a reference for validating new decoding attempts, allowing the UE to filter out false alarms that occur due to interference in heterogeneous networks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If blind decoding is performed until successful CRC check, then decoding accuracy improves, but processing time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecoding accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by performing blind decoding with CRC checks only when necessary - specifically when system information changes are detected or when initially acquiring system information. For unchanged information, the UE reuses previously decoded data, avoiding redundant processing and reducing overall processing time while maintaining decoding accuracy when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Loss of information

If system information is updated in every radio frame, then information freshness improves, but false alarms increase due to interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation freshnessVSAvoidfalse alarm rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses feedback by comparing newly decoded system information with previously stored information. The UE determines whether an update is actually needed based on this comparison, rather than blindly accepting every decoded frame. This feedback mechanism maintains information freshness when changes occur while filtering out false updates caused by interference in heterogeneous networks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP2460300B1Broadcast channel decoding
Publication Date: 2017.10.18 QUALCOMM INC
  • EP2460300B1 patent drawing
  • EP2460300B1 patent drawing
  • EP2460300B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for reliable channel decoding in a wireless network are provided. In one aspect, a wireless device receives system information over a physical broadcast channel of a downlink transmission. The wireless device decodes the physical broadcast channel of a current radio frame using a plurality of hypotheses until the decoding passes a cyclic redundancy check. Thereafter, the wireless device compares system information from the current radio frame with information obtained from a previous radio frame. The information from the previous radio frame may include one or more network parameters which may be stored in a memory of the wireless device. In some aspects, the comparison may be performed over a plurality of radio frames. Based at least in part on a result of the comparing, the wireless device may selectively reject system information from one or more of the radio frames.