PCB Electrical Property Management via Taguchi and Response Surface Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The design of printed circuit boards (PCBs) faces challenges in effectively managing process factors that influence electrical properties such as impedance, voltage, and amplitude variations, which are crucial for the quality of electronic devices but are complex and difficult to optimize.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a managing module in a computing device that measures and analyzes differential impedances, selects key process factors, designs experiments using the Taguchi method, and applies Response Surface Methodology to determine the optimal values of these factors, ultimately fitting a computing formula to control electrical properties like differential impedance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple process factors are considered in PCB design to achieve desired electrical properties, then the quality and reliability of electronic devices are improved, but the design complexity and difficulty of optimization increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of electronic devicesVSAvoiddesign complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex design process into distinct phases: first identifying key process factors through statistical analysis (ANOVA), then optimizing each factor systematically using Taguchi method and Response Surface Methodology. This segmentation transforms the overwhelming multi-factor optimization problem into manageable sequential steps, reducing design complexity while maintaining reliability improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent systematically changes and optimizes process parameters (such as line width, line spacing, drill hole diameter, plating thickness) using statistical methods. By applying Taguchi orthogonal arrays and response surface methodology, the patent identifies optimal parameter combinations that achieve desired electrical properties (impedance control, signal integrity) while simplifying the optimization process through structured parameter exploration rather than trial-and-error.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If traditional trial-and-error methods are used to optimize process factors, then the design process is simple to understand, but the time consumption and resource usage increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of design processVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary statistical analysis (ANOVA) to identify which process factors have the most significant impact on electrical properties before proceeding to optimization. This preliminary action filters out insignificant factors, allowing the design team to focus resources on optimizing only the critical parameters, thereby reducing time consumption while maintaining ease of operation through targeted rather than exhaustive optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses Taguchi orthogonal arrays to create a structured experimental design that efficiently explores the parameter space. Instead of requiring numerous trial-and-error iterations, the orthogonal array provides a predetermined set of experiments that systematically covers factor combinations, reducing time consumption while maintaining simplicity through a standardized experimental framework that can be replicated and scaled.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive experimental designs are conducted to identify all influencing factors, then the accuracy of factor identification is improved, but the number of experiments and associated costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of factor identificationVSAvoidexperimentation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a dynamic, two-stage experimental approach: first using ANOVA to screen and identify significant factors, then applying Taguchi method and Response Surface Methodology to optimize only those identified factors. This dynamic adaptation of the experimental scope based on preliminary results maintains high accuracy in factor identification while improving productivity by avoiding unnecessary experiments on insignificant factors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and isolates the key influencing factors from the full set of potential process parameters through statistical analysis. By separating the critical factors (those with significant impact on electrical properties) from the non-critical ones, the patent enables focused optimization experiments on only the essential parameters, thereby maintaining measurement precision while significantly reducing the total number of experiments and associated costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS8341587B2Method of managing process factors that influence electrical properties of printed circuit boards
Publication Date: 2012.12.25 CLOUD NETWORK TECH SINGAPORE PTE LTD
  • US8341587B2 patent drawing
  • US8341587B2 patent drawing
  • US8341587B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a method of managing process factors that influence electrical properties of printed circuit boards (PCBs), n process factors are arranged in an order according to different influence to one kind of electrical property of the PCBs. The different influence is determined by first experiments designed using the Taguchi method. M process factors that have important influence to the electrical property are obtained from the n process factors according to the order to design second experiments. A computing formula for the electrical property is fitted using the m process factors according to simulated results of the second experiments, and a variation range of each of the m process factors is computed according to the computing formula.