PCB Layout Parasitic Impedance Prediction Using GNN Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current circuit board layout tools inaccurately predict parasitic impedances, leading to discrepancies between simulated and actual performance, which prolongs the design cycle and increases costs due to iterative manufacturing revisions.

Innovation Solution

Employing a machine learning model, specifically a graphical neural network (GNN), to analyze PCB layouts and accurately estimate parasitic impedances, thereby improving the prediction of circuit board performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If current circuit board layout tools are used to predict parasitic impedances, then the design process is simple and fast, but the prediction accuracy is insufficient leading to discrepancies between simulated and actual performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracy of parasitic impedancesVSAvoidcomplexity of layout tool
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional physics-based electromagnetic simulation methods with a machine learning model that has been trained on simulation data. This substitution allows the system to achieve high prediction accuracy for parasitic impedances while avoiding the computational complexity and time consumption of traditional simulation methods. The machine learning model learns patterns from training data and directly predicts results without requiring complex real-time simulations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary training of the machine learning model using extensive simulation data before actual design work. This preliminary action creates a pre-trained model that can quickly and accurately predict parasitic impedances during the actual design phase, eliminating the need to perform complex simulations for each new design iteration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If traditional layout tools are used, then the tool complexity is low, but iterative manufacturing revisions are required increasing time and cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign cycle timeVSAvoidtime for iterative revisions
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces time-consuming traditional simulation methods with a trained machine learning model that provides rapid predictions. This substitution dramatically reduces the time required for each design iteration, enabling engineers to perform multiple iterations quickly and identify optimal designs before manufacturing, thereby reducing the need for costly iterative revisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the machine learning model's predictions are continuously refined based on comparison with actual measurement data from manufactured boards. This feedback loop improves the model's accuracy over time, leading to even better predictions and further reduction in iterative revisions needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If machine learning models are employed to predict parasitic impedances, then prediction accuracy is improved, but computational resources and model training time are increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of parasitic impedance predictionVSAvoidcomputational resources for model training
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs the computationally intensive model training phase as a preliminary action before actual design work. Once the model is trained on comprehensive simulation data, it can be deployed for rapid predictions during design iterations. This separates the heavy computational burden (training) from the operational phase (prediction), making the system efficient for practical use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a simplified computational model that copies the essential patterns learned from extensive training data. This copied model can then make accurate predictions without requiring the full computational resources needed for training or for traditional physics-based simulations, achieving a balance between accuracy and resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS12566911B2Machine learning tool for layout design of printed circuit board
Publication Date: 2026.03.03 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US12566911B2 patent drawing
  • US12566911B2 patent drawing
  • US12566911B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure is directed to a system and method for applying machine learning model to a PCB layout to obtain an estimate of the parasitic values of the board. The machine learning model may be trained with various PCB layouts to accurately determine an estimated parasitic impedance. Determine regions of the board having a high parasitic impedance value, alerting the user to reconfiguring the region so to achieve a desired range of values.