PCB Magnetic Core Array Inductor Structure for Smaller Embedded Inductors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pattern-shaped inductors on printed circuit boards lack the efficiency of chip inductors due to lower capacitance per unit volume, larger volume, and higher resistance, making it difficult to implement low-capacity inductors effectively.

Innovation Solution

Implement a magnetic core array inductor (MCAI) structure using a printed circuit board with a magnetic layer, through-vias, insulating layers, and metal pillars to form inductors, allowing for reduced size and easier mounting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If pattern-shaped inductors are used on printed circuit boards, then implementation is simpler, but inductor capacity is lower and volume is larger

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidinductor volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent embeds chip-shaped inductors directly into the printed circuit board structure by forming cavities within the PCB and placing the inductors inside these cavities. This nesting approach allows the inductor to be integrated within the board thickness rather than occupying additional surface area, effectively reducing the overall volume occupied by the inductor while maintaining ease of manufacture through standardized embedding processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from surface-mounted pattern-shaped inductors to three-dimensional chip-shaped inductors embedded within the PCB volume. By utilizing the vertical dimension (embedding within board layers) rather than only surface placement, the design achieves higher capacitance per unit volume while keeping the footprint on the board surface minimal

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of manufacture

If pattern-shaped inductors are used on printed circuit boards, then manufacturing is easier, but resistance is higher

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing easeVSAvoidinductor resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the inductor structure from two-dimensional pattern traces to three-dimensional chip configurations with optimized winding patterns. This parameter change increases the effective conductor cross-sectional area and reduces the current path length, thereby reducing resistance and energy loss while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through automated placement and soldering processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Use of energy by moving object

If low-capacity inductors are implemented, then power efficiency increases, but inductor size reduction is difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower efficiencyVSAvoidinductor size
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality optimization by using magnetic core materials with high permeability in specific regions of the inductor structure. This allows the inductor to achieve low capacitance values through optimized magnetic path design and core material selection, enabling low-capacity implementation with correspondingly reduced size while maintaining high power efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The MCAI structure reduces inductor size, facilitates easier arrangement and mounting, and enhances space efficiency while providing adjustable inductor capacity.

Implementation Method 1

a magnetic layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetism: Magnetism

Implementation Method 2

a plurality of through-vias respectively penetrating through the magnetic layer; a plurality of insulating films respectively disposed on wall surfaces of the plurality of through-holes; a plurality of metal pillars respectively disposed on the plurality of insulating films and disposed in at least portions of the plurality of through-holes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical conduction: Conduction (electrical)

Data Source

PatentUS20250275062A1Printed circuit board
Publication Date: 2025.08.28 SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS CO LTD
  • US20250275062A1 patent drawing
  • US20250275062A1 patent drawing
  • US20250275062A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a printed circuit board including: a magnetic layer; a plurality of through-vias respectively penetrating through the magnetic layer; a plurality of first pads disposed on upper surfaces of the plurality of through-vias, respectively; a plurality of second pads disposed on lower surfaces of the plurality of through-vias, respectively; a first insulating layer covering at least portions of the plurality of first pads; a second insulating layer covering at least portions of the plurality of second pads. At least a portion of a side surface of the magnetic layer is substantially coplanar with at least a portion of one or more of a side surface of the first insulating layer and a side surface of the second insulating layer.