PCB Design for Manufacturing Across Multiple Suppliers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current design for manufacturing (DFM) tools generate numerous false-positives due to design-agnostic constraints, making it impractical for designers to manually customize constraint sets for multiple suppliers, leading to reduced yield and product quality in printed circuit board assembly.

Innovation Solution

A computing system that parses a product model definition to identify physical design characteristics and correlates them with manufacturing processes, selecting relevant manufacturing checks to determine conformity with manufacturing-related design constraints, thereby performing a manufacturing analysis tailored to specific suppliers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If design-agnostic constraint sets are applied to all manufacturers, then manufacturing analysis can be performed universally, but numerous false-positives are generated reducing accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuniversal manufacturability analysisVSAvoidmanufacturing analysis accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by transitioning from universal design-agnostic constraints to manufacturer-specific constraints. Each manufacturer receives customized constraint sets tailored to their specific manufacturing capabilities, processes, and standards. This allows the DFM tool to apply appropriate constraints locally to each manufacturer rather than using a one-size-fits-all approach, thereby eliminating false-positives while maintaining universal adaptability across multiple manufacturers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically selects and applies constraints based on the target manufacturer. The DFM tool can adaptively configure constraint sets according to which manufacturer will produce the PCB assembly, allowing the analysis to be both universally applicable and manufacturer-specific. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by making the constraint application flexible rather than static.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If customized constraint sets are manually built for each manufacturer, then manufacturing analysis accuracy improves, but the process becomes time-consuming and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing analysis accuracyVSAvoidconstraint customization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The DFM tool performs self-service by automatically generating and configuring manufacturer-specific constraint sets without requiring extensive manual intervention. The system can autonomously adapt constraints based on manufacturer profiles, capabilities, and specifications stored in its database, thereby improving accuracy while reducing the complexity and time burden of manual customization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manufacturer profiles, capabilities, and constraint parameters are pre-configured and stored in the system database before actual DFM analysis is performed. This preliminary preparation allows the system to quickly retrieve and apply appropriate constraints during analysis, eliminating the need for time-consuming manual customization while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If customized constraint sets are manually built for each manufacturer, then manufacturing analysis accuracy improves, but extensive manual interaction is required increasing time consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing analysis accuracyVSAvoidconstraint customization time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The DFM tool automatically retrieves manufacturer-specific constraints from pre-configured profiles and applies them to the PCB assembly analysis without requiring extensive manual interaction. This self-service capability maintains high measurement precision while dramatically reducing the time investment required for constraint customization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

All manufacturer-specific constraint parameters, capabilities, and profiles are pre-configured and stored in the system before actual DFM analysis begins. This preliminary preparation enables the system to quickly apply appropriate constraints during analysis, eliminating time-consuming manual customization steps while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Device complexity

If design for manufacturing analysis is performed for a single manufacturer, then the analysis process is simplified, but the assumption of universal manufacturability does not hold reducing yield and product quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis process complexityVSAvoidproduct yield and quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The DFM tool achieves multi-functionality by being capable of performing manufacturer-specific analysis for multiple different manufacturers within a single system. It can switch between different manufacturer profiles and constraint sets, providing both simplified analysis processes and manufacturer-specific accuracy. This allows the tool to serve multiple manufacturers while maintaining high reliability and product quality for each.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10354043B2Printed circuit board design for manufacturing across multiple suppliers
Publication Date: 2019.07.16 MENTOR GRAPHICS CORP
  • US10354043B2 patent drawing
  • US10354043B2 patent drawing
  • US10354043B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This application discloses a computing system to parse a product model definition that includes a layout design of a printed circuit board assembly, which identifies physical design characteristics of the layout design of the printed circuit board assembly. The computing system can identify one or more manufacturing processes capable of manufacturing at least a portion of the printed circuit board assembly having the identified physical design characteristics. The computing system can include a map or correlation between the manufacturing processes and manufacturing-related design constraints. The computing system can select one or more manufacturing checks that define manufacturing-related design constraints correlated to the identified manufacturing processes. The computing system can perform a manufacturing analysis, by implementing the manufacturing checks, which can determine whether the layout design of the printed circuit board assembly conforms to the manufacturing-related design constraints defined in the manufacturing checks.