AI-Based PCB Mounting Error Detection Using Reference Image Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for detecting errors in PCB mounting are not fully automated, are complex, or unsuitable for small batches, leading to inefficiencies and potential use of defective boards in further manufacturing.

Innovation Solution

A method using artificial intelligence algorithms to detect errors in PCB element mounting through image comparison with a reference image, verifying qualities such as LED illumination, orientation, and correct placement, utilizing neural networks and Siamese networks for accurate detection and alert triggering.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If traditional methods for detecting PCB mounting errors are used, then the detection process is simpler to implement, but the automation level is insufficient and the system becomes complex and time-consuming for small batches

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation levelVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses template copying where a reference image of the correct PCB layout is created and stored. During inspection, the captured image is compared against this template copy to automatically detect mounting errors. This copying approach enables full automation while keeping the system relatively simple by relying on image comparison rather than complex multi-stage processing systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual visual inspection with automated image processing using computer vision algorithms. The mechanical/optical system captures images of PCBs, and computational algorithms automatically analyze these images to detect errors, substituting human operators with an automated digital inspection system that can process multiple boards rapidly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If manual inspection methods are used, then the system is simpler and faster to implement, but the detection speed and accuracy are insufficient for modern manufacturing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection speedVSAvoidinspection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables continuous inspection by capturing images of PCBs as they move through the assembly line and automatically processing these images in real-time. The system continuously compares captured images against templates and triggers alerts immediately when errors are detected, maintaining continuous production flow without interruptions for manual inspection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces slow manual visual inspection with automated digital image capture and processing systems. Computer vision algorithms rapidly analyze captured images to detect mounting errors, significantly increasing detection speed while the automated nature of the system handles the complexity of multi-parameter verification (position, orientation, component type) consistently and efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If comprehensive error detection is performed, then the quality control is improved, but the inspection time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality controlVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the inspection process into multiple independent verification steps: detecting missing components, verifying correct component placement, checking orientation, and validating LED illumination properties. Each aspect is checked separately through targeted image analysis, allowing comprehensive quality control while maintaining efficient processing by addressing each verification task independently rather than through a single time-consuming comprehensive review.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20240135527A1Method of detecting errors in the placement of elements in the PCB
Publication Date: 2024.04.25 FITECH SPOKA Z OGRANICZON ODPOWIEDZIALNOCI
  • US20240135527A1 patent drawing
  • US20240135527A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Detecting mounting errors of elements on a PCB, carried out with the use of a computer includes providing an image of a PCB and an image of a reference PCB to an error detection module, detecting, in the error detection module, with the use of artificial intelligence algorithms, of errors in mounting of elements in the image of the PCB, indicating the mounting errors.