PCEF QCI Interpretation for Cross-RAT QoS Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing use of QCI (QoS Class Index) in cellular systems is limited, as operator-controlled QCI values lack standard interpretation and are not effectively utilized across different Radio Access Technologies (RATs), leading to inconsistent QoS management.

Innovation Solution

A Policy and Charging Enforcement Function (PCEF) is designed to interpret QCI values in a standardized manner up to a predefined limit and in a technology-specific manner beyond that limit, allowing QCI values to convey additional information such as packet priority or GTP-U header markings, enabling flexible QoS management across various RATs without requiring new parameters or QoS paradigms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If operator-controlled QCI values are used without standard interpretation, then flexibility in QoS management is reduced, but consistency across different RATs is improved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in QoS managementVSAvoidconsistency across RATs
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the interpretation parameter of QCI values based on the RAT type. For E-UTRAN, QCI values 1-9 are interpreted as standard QoS Class Indices, while for GERAN/UTRAN, the same QCI values are interpreted as Packet Data Priority levels. This parameter change enables the system to maintain consistency in the PCC interface while adapting to the specific QoS requirements of each RAT type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If new parameters or QoS paradigms are introduced to improve QoS management, then QoS control capability is enhanced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveQoS control capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the existing QCI parameter multi-functional by enabling it to represent different QoS concepts depending on the RAT type. The same QCI value can represent QoS Class Index for E-UTRAN or Packet Data Priority for GERAN/UTRAN. This universality eliminates the need for separate parameters for different RAT types, thereby enhancing QoS control capability without increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The PCEF acts as an intermediary that translates QCI values into RAT-specific QoS parameters. It receives QCI values from the PCRF via the PCC interface and interprets them according to the target RAT type, converting them into appropriate QoS parameters for that RAT. This intermediary function enables seamless QoS management across heterogeneous RATs without requiring changes to the PCC interface or introduction of new parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP2837129B1Generalization of quality class indices in a wireless network
Publication Date: 2016.03.09 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • EP2837129B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2837129B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2837129B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A PCEF (400) for a cellular system, arranged (405, 410) to receive data packets from at least one other node via a certain Radio Access Technology, RAT, the PCEF (400) also being arranged to communicate with a PCRF via a PCC interface. The PCEF (400) is further arranged (425, 430) to set up Service Data flows, SDFs, which SDFs are defined for the PCEF (400) by the PCRF over the PCC interface and which comprise filters for received data packets. Said filters define a Quality Class Index, a QCI, for each received data packet, and the PCEF (400) is arranged (415, 420) to interpret QCIs for received data packets up to and including a predefined value in a first predefined manner for all RATs, and to interpret (415, 420) QCIs over said predefined value in a second predefined manner.