Passive Coherent Location Signal Prediction and Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Passive coherent location systems face accuracy degradation due to noise and atmospheric interference, as they rely on non-cooperative signals of opportunity, which can vary in quality and availability.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus comprising a forecaster, evaluator, and correlator that predicts radio-frequency signals, generates an effectiveness metric, and determines the position and velocity of objects using a radio-frequency signal with the highest accuracy, thereby selecting the most effective signal and reducing noise impact.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If non-cooperative signals of opportunity are used for passive coherent location, then the system can operate without active transmitters, but the accuracy is degraded due to noise and atmospheric interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem operation capabilityVSAvoidlocation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The forecaster generates predictions of the direct path signal in advance before the actual signal reception. This preliminary action allows the system to have a reference signal available for correlation processing, enabling accurate location measurements even when the reflected signal is weak or buried in noise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The predicted direct path signal acts as an intermediary reference that mediates between the noisy received signal and the location calculation. By correlating the received signal with the predicted reference, the system can extract accurate location information while rejecting noise and interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple non-cooperative signals are available, then signal availability increases, but selecting the optimal signal becomes complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal availabilityVSAvoidsignal selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The manual or complex algorithmic signal selection process is replaced by an effectiveness metric calculation that automatically evaluates and ranks available signals. The metric quantifies signal quality based on forecast accuracy, allowing the system to automatically select the best signal without complex decision logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter used for signal selection from simple signal strength to an effectiveness metric that incorporates forecast accuracy and signal characteristics. This parameter transformation enables automatic optimization of signal selection based on the specific operational context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If the receiver continuously monitors all available signals, then signal quality can be optimized, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal qualityVSAvoidreceiver energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The forecaster performs preliminary evaluation of available signals and their effectiveness metrics before the receiver begins full monitoring. This advance preparation allows the system to identify and focus on only the most promising signals, reducing the receiver's monitoring burden and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of continuously monitoring all available signals at full capacity, the system applies partial monitoring by focusing resources on signals that exceed a certain effectiveness threshold. This selective approach maintains signal quality optimization while significantly reducing energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Improves the accuracy and sensitivity of passive coherent location by predicting and selecting the best available radio-frequency signals, reducing reliance on suboptimal signals and enhancing noise reduction.

Implementation Method 1

The correlator determines, from the radio-frequency signal reflected from the object as received at the receiver, an ambiguity function having a maximum at a temporal offset and a Doppler shift

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDoppler shift: Doppler Effect

Data Source

PatentUS12015824B2Passive coherent location with a prediction of a broadcast signal
Publication Date: 2024.06.18 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY
  • US12015824B2 patent drawing
  • US12015824B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus for passive coherent location includes a forecaster, an evaluator, a receiver, and a correlator. The forecaster generates a prediction of a radio-frequency signal transmitted from an antenna of a broadcasting service. The evaluator generates an effectiveness metric from the prediction of the radio-frequency signal. The receiver receives the radio-frequency signal that an object reflects from the antenna to the receiver. The correlator determines, from the radio-frequency signal reflected from the object as received at the receiver, an ambiguity function having a maximum at a temporal offset and a Doppler shift. The temporal offset and the Doppler shift at the maximum partially determine at least a position of the object. The apparatus optionally includes a selector for tuning the receiver to the radio-frequency signal in response to the effectiveness metric.