PD-1 Pathway Inhibitor Small Molecules for Oral Cancer Therapy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current therapeutic options for modulating the PD-1 pathway, particularly for cancer therapy, rely heavily on antibodies, with a need for alternative small molecules that offer advantages in oral administration, stability, bioavailability, and toxicity profile.

Innovation Solution

Development of novel compounds with specific structural formulas that act as inhibitors of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway, including pharmaceutical compositions and methods for their preparation and use in therapeutic treatments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If antibody-based therapies are used to block the PD-1 pathway, then therapeutic efficacy against cancer is achieved, but administration complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapeutic efficacyVSAvoidadministration convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical/administrative complexity of antibody delivery (intravenous infusion, cold chain storage, injection equipment) with small molecule compounds that can be administered orally as pills or capsules. This substitution maintains the biological therapeutic effect while eliminating the mechanical delivery system complexities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the chemical parameter of the therapeutic agent from large protein-based antibodies to small organic molecules. This parameter change enables different administration routes (oral vs. parenteral), different storage conditions, and different pharmacokinetic profiles, thereby improving ease of operation while maintaining efficacy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If antibody-based therapies are used to block the PD-1 pathway, then immune response is enhanced, but production cost and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimmune response enhancementVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes the complex biomanufacturing process required for antibodies (cell culture, purification, formulation, cold chain logistics) with small molecule synthesis processes that are more standardized, scalable, and less equipment-intensive. This reduces device complexity in manufacturing while preserving the immune response enhancement effect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the manufacturing parameter from biologics production (requiring GMP-certified cell culture facilities, specialized equipment, and complex quality control) to small molecule synthesis (using established chemical manufacturing processes). This parameter change simplifies the manufacturing device complexity while maintaining therapeutic reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If alternative small molecules are developed, then oral administration and stability are improved, but development complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoral administration capabilityVSAvoidmolecular design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the complex task of small molecule design into manageable components: identifying the target binding pocket, selecting scaffold structures, optimizing pharmacophore elements, and refining pharmacokinetic properties. This segmented approach makes the overall development process more systematic and less overwhelming.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention employs preliminary action by pre-selecting candidate scaffold structures and pharmacophore elements before full optimization. Computational modeling and in silico screening are performed in advance to identify promising candidates, reducing the complexity of subsequent experimental development and streamlining the path to oral administration-capable molecules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP3474845B1Immunomodulator compounds
Publication Date: 2024.03.20 CHEMOCENTRYX INC
  • EP3474845B1 patent drawing
  • EP3474845B1 patent drawing
  • EP3474845B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Compounds are provided that are useful as immunomodulators. The compounds have the following Formula (II): including stereoisomers and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof, wherein R1, R2a, R2b, R2c, R3, R4, R5, R6a, R6b, m and n are as defined herein. Methods associated with preparation and use of such compounds, as well as pharmaceutical compositions comprising such compounds, are also disclosed.