Sequential PD-1 and LAG-3 Therapy After CCRT for NSCLC

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current treatments for unresectable, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have suboptimal patient outcomes, with a need for improved therapeutic methods that address the heterogeneity of this disease and provide effective treatment options beyond definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Innovation Solution

A combination therapy involving programmed death-1 (PD-1) pathway inhibitors and lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG-3) antagonists, administered sequentially with a recovery period following chemoradiotherapy, to enhance treatment efficacy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by durvalumab maintenance is used, then treatment standard is established, but patient outcomes remain suboptimal with large fraction of patients without appropriate treatment options

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient outcomesVSAvoidtreatment options
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The treatment protocol is segmented into distinct phases: concurrent chemoradiotherapy phase, recovery period, and subsequent combination immunotherapy phase (PD-1 inhibitor plus LAG-3 antagonist). This segmentation allows each phase to be optimized independently while addressing the heterogeneity of disease progression and patient response patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The treatment approach transitions dynamically from conventional chemoradiotherapy to a combination immunotherapy regimen based on patient response and disease characteristics. The protocol adapts treatment selection and sequencing based on tumor biology, patient tolerance, and response criteria, enabling personalized treatment dynamics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If multi-modality treatment paradigms are applied to unresectable Stage III NSCLC, then treatment coverage is expanded, but disease heterogeneity requires challenging treatment approaches

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment coverageVSAvoidtreatment paradigm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The protocol applies local quality by selecting specific treatment modalities based on local disease characteristics and patient-specific factors. Treatment intensity, sequencing, and combination strategies are adjusted according to the specific presentation, stage, and biological features of each patient's tumor, rather than applying a uniform approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The treatment paradigm utilizes parameter changes by modifying treatment timing, duration, and combination based on response criteria and patient status. The protocol adjusts immunotherapy initiation timing based on recovery from chemoradiotherapy, and modifies treatment duration and intensity based on disease response and patient tolerance parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If PD-1 pathway inhibitor and LAG-3 antagonist combination therapy is administered, then immune response is enhanced and treatment outcomes improve, but treatment sequencing and recovery period requirements increase complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment outcomesVSAvoidtherapy sequencing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The protocol incorporates a recovery period between chemoradiotherapy and the initiation of combination immunotherapy, allowing preliminary tissue healing and immune system stabilization. This preliminary action reduces the risk of overlapping toxicities and optimizes the immune system's ability to respond to subsequent immunotherapy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The treatment maintains continuity of useful action by seamlessly transitioning from chemoradiotherapy to combination immunotherapy based on patient response and tolerance. The protocol ensures continuous disease control through coordinated timing of treatment phases, preventing disease progression gaps while managing treatment-related toxicities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20260000757A1Combination therapy for lung cancer
Publication Date: 2026.01.01 BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB CO
  • US20260000757A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure provides a method of treating a human subject afflicted with lung cancer (e.g., non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)) with a programmed death-1 (PD-1) pathway inhibitor (e.g., an anti-PD-1 antibody) and a concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT, e.g., a platinum doublet chemotherapy (PDCT) and a radiation therapy) followed by a combination of a PD-1 pathway inhibitor (e.g., an anti-PD-1 antibody) and a lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG-3) antagonist (e.g., an anti-LAG-3 antibody). In some aspects, the method comprises a recovery period that begins upon completion of the treatment with the PD-1 pathway inhibitor and the CCRT and ends at the start of the treatment with the combination of the PD-1 pathway inhibitor and the LAG-3 antagonist.