PDCP Status Reporting Assistance for Wireless Scheduling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems, particularly in 5G NR, face challenges in optimizing downlink and uplink scheduling due to the lack of efficient mechanisms for handling Packet Data Convergence Protocol (PDCP) status reports, leading to duplicate transmissions and scheduling delays, especially in non-terrestrial networks (NTNs) where handovers and satellite communications are involved.

Innovation Solution

The system introduces assistance information mechanisms where a central unit (CU) provides a distributed unit (DU) with PDCP status reports, allowing the DU to determine optimal scheduling timing and minimize duplicate transmissions by buffering data until the status report is received, and optionally indicating further assistance information to ensure synchronized scheduling across CU and DU capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If the network entity sends downlink data before receiving PDCP status report, then data transmission speed is improved, but duplicate transmissions occur causing loss of information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission speedVSAvoidduplicate transmissions
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The network entity performs preliminary actions by sending downlink data before receiving the PDCP status report, but implements a mechanism to track and identify duplicate transmissions. The invention uses a PDCP status report reception indicator and duplicate detection mechanisms to prevent actual data loss while maintaining transmission speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention implements feedback mechanisms where the UE sends PDCP status reports to the network entity, indicating which PDCP PDUs were successfully received. The network entity uses this feedback to identify and eliminate duplicate transmissions, resolving the contradiction between fast transmission and avoiding duplicates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of information

If the network entity waits for PDCP status report before sending downlink data, then duplicate transmissions are avoided, but scheduling delays increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveduplicate transmissionsVSAvoidscheduling delays
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The network entity sends downlink data in advance without waiting for the PDCP status report, using preliminary transmission followed by duplicate detection and elimination based on subsequent status reports.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention allows the network to skip the traditional waiting step for PDCP status reports by implementing parallel processing where data transmission occurs concurrently with status report reception, eliminating unnecessary delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

3Productivity

If continuous downlink data transmission is performed, then data throughput is improved, but feeder link congestion occurs in NTNs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata throughputVSAvoidfeeder link congestion
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention implements periodic suspension of downlink data transmission to allow PDCP status reports to be received and processed. This periodic action prevents continuous transmission from causing feeder link congestion while maintaining acceptable data throughput through efficient use of transmission opportunities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The network entity delivers downlink data to the DU in advance before receiving PDCP status reports, allowing the data to be buffered and transmitted efficiently without causing feeder link congestion during status report reception periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Duration of action of moving object

If PDCP status report reception is delayed, then data transmission continuity is improved, but unreceived PDCP SDUs remain causing incomplete data delivery

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission continuityVSAvoidunreceived PDCP SDUs
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The network entity performs preliminary data transmission and buffering actions, delivering downlink data to the DU before receiving PDCP status reports. This allows continuous transmission while ensuring data is available for immediate forwarding once status reports are received.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces an intermediary buffering mechanism where downlink data is stored at the DU before being forwarded to the UE. This intermediary buffer decouples the timing between data transmission and PDCP status report reception, maintaining continuity while ensuring complete data delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20240430741A1F1 enhancement for PDCP status reporting
Publication Date: 2024.12.26 QUALCOMM INC
  • US20240430741A1 patent drawing
  • US20240430741A1 patent drawing
  • US20240430741A1 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure provides methods, components, devices and systems for enhanced downlink and uplink scheduling based on assistance information related to PDCP status reports. Some aspects specifically relate to a wireless communication system including a disaggregated base station architecture in which a CU provides a DU assistance information related to PDCP status reports from which assistance information the DU may determine appropriate downlink or uplink scheduling start timing for a UE. In some examples, the DU obtains from the CU assistance information indicating an unreceived PDCP SDU at a UE or the CU, and sends downlink data or an uplink grant to the UE based on the assistance information. The CU may deliver the downlink data to the DU prior to sending the assistance information or obtain uplink data from the DU after sending the assistance information. Duplication of PDCP SDU transmissions and unnecessarily extended scheduling delays may thus be minimized.