PDH Separation With Mixed Refrigerant Cooling and Lower Power

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current Propane Dehydrogenation (PDH) separation systems face high power consumption, increased costs due to turbo-expander/generator sets, high compressor discharge pressure, and limited flexibility in adjusting separation temperatures.

Innovation Solution

A Mixed Refrigerant (MR) system with heat exchangers and drums provides refrigeration for separation and recovery of olefin products, eliminating the need for turbo-expander/generator sets and allowing for reduced compressor discharge pressure, improved maintenance, and independent refrigeration control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If turbo-expander/generator sets are used for de-pressurization and refrigeration, then refrigeration for separation is provided, but power consumption increases and maintenance requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverefrigeration temperatureVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the turbo-expander/generator sets from the system, replacing them with a simpler valve-based de-pressurization system. This removes the complex mechanical components that consumed power and required maintenance, while still achieving the necessary refrigeration through the Joule-Thomson effect in the expansion valve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical turbo-expander system with a non-mechanical valve-based expansion system. This substitution eliminates moving parts that require maintenance and power input, using instead a pressure-driven thermal effect to achieve refrigeration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Temperature

If turbo-expander/generator sets are used for de-pressurization, then refrigeration is provided, but device complexity and maintenance requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverefrigeration temperatureVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the complex turbo-expander/generator sets from the system architecture, retaining only the essential function of de-pressurization and refrigeration through a simpler valve-based system. This extraction of unnecessary complexity directly reduces maintenance requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using a complex mechanical system to actively create refrigeration, the patent inverts the approach by using a passive thermal effect (Joule-Thomson cooling) that occurs naturally during pressure reduction, eliminating the need for complex mechanical refrigeration equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Reliability

If Reactor Effluent Compressor discharge pressure is increased to high pressure, then separation and recovery is achieved, but capital costs and operating costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation efficiencyVSAvoidcapital cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the pressure parameter from high pressure operation to a more moderate pressure range. By optimizing the compression pressure to be lower than traditional high-pressure systems, the patent reduces capital costs for pressure vessels and piping while maintaining separation efficiency through the subsequent expansion and refrigeration process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If Reactor Effluent Compressor discharge pressure is increased to high pressure, then separation and recovery is achieved, but operating costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation efficiencyVSAvoidoperating cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the compression pressure parameter to a lower value, reducing the work required by the compressor and thereby lowering operating costs. The separation efficiency is maintained not through high pressure alone, but through the combination of moderate pressure compression followed by expansion-induced refrigeration and condensation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

5Reliability

If fixed separation temperatures are used in prior art systems, then separation is achieved, but flexibility to adjust temperatures is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation performanceVSAvoidtemperature adjustment flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic control capabilities to the separation system, allowing temperatures to be adjusted based on varying feed conditions and product requirements. This is achieved through controllable expansion valves and heat exchangers that can modulate their operation, transforming the system from static to dynamic temperature control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a multi-functional separation system that can handle different feed compositions and produce different product specifications by adjusting operating parameters. The system is designed to be universally applicable to various olefin separation needs, not limited to a single fixed operating point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The MR system reduces power consumption, lowers capital and operating costs, enhances system reliability, and allows for more flexible and robust design, achieving efficient olefin and hydrogen separation while maintaining product recovery efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

a main heat exchanger configured to cool and partially condense an effluent stream so that a mixed phase stream is formed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCondensation: Condensation

Implementation Method 2

a separation system configured to separate the mixed phase stream into a vapor stream and a liquid stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase separation: Phase Change

Implementation Method 3

The main heat exchanger is configured to warm the effluent stream to provide refrigeration in the main heat exchanger

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Data Source

PatentUS11629912B2Dehydrogenation separation unit with mixed refrigerant cooling
Publication Date: 2023.04.18 U S BANK TRUST CO NAT ASSOC AS THE NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
  • US11629912B2 patent drawing
  • US11629912B2 patent drawing
  • US11629912B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A main heat exchanger receives and partially condenses an effluent fluid stream so that a mixed phase effluent stream is formed. A primary separation device receives and separates the mixed phase effluent stream into a primary vapor stream including hydrogen and a primary liquid stream including an olefinic hydrocarbon. The main heat exchanger receives and warms at least a portion of the primary vapor stream to provide refrigeration for partially condensing the effluent fluid stream. The main heat exchanger also receives, warms and partially vaporizes the primary liquid stream. A mixed refrigerant compression system also provides refrigeration in the main heat exchanger.