PDSCH Group Scheduling With Asynchronous HARQ Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless communication systems face challenges in improving the capacity and reducing latency for extended reality (XR) services, particularly in scheduling multiple physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) transmissions, which result in unnecessary latency when HARQ feedback is delayed due to synchronized feedback timing for all PDSCH transmissions.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves determining a first number of time domain resources for multiple PDSCH transmissions, defining PDSCH transmission groups, and specifying a feedback time unit for hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) information, allowing for flexible scheduling and asynchronous HARQ feedback to reduce latency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If synchronized feedback timing is used for all PDSCH transmissions, then system simplicity is maintained, but feedback latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback timing synchronizationVSAvoidfeedback latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments PDSCH transmissions into multiple groups (first group, second group, etc.) with different feedback timing requirements. Each group can have its own feedback time unit, allowing early groups to provide feedback sooner while later groups follow synchronized timing. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by enabling partial asynchronous feedback that reduces overall latency while maintaining system simplicity through structured grouping.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic feedback timing where the feedback time unit is determined based on the group index and configurable parameters. Different PDSCH groups can have different feedback delays (e.g., first group feedbacks after K1 slots, second group after K2 slots), creating a dynamic feedback schedule that optimizes latency for urgent data while maintaining synchronization for other transmissions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If multiple PDSCH transmissions are scheduled, then throughput is improved, but feedback latency increases due to waiting for all transmissions

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidfeedback latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting PDSCH transmissions into groups with different feedback timing, the patent enables early groups to complete feedback cycles faster while later groups extend throughput capacity. This allows the system to maintain high throughput through multiple simultaneous transmissions while reducing the effective feedback latency for at least some of the data, resolving the contradiction between throughput improvement and latency increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by scheduling early PDSCH groups with shorter feedback delays to provide quick acknowledgments for time-sensitive data, while later groups handle less urgent transmissions. This preliminary feedback for early groups reduces overall system latency while the extended scheduling of multiple groups maintains high throughput capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of time

If asynchronous HARQ feedback is implemented, then latency is reduced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback latencyVSAvoidfeedback timing management
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent manages asynchronous feedback complexity through segmentation into PDSCH groups, where each group has predetermined feedback timing rules based on group index and configurable parameters. This structured approach to asynchrony reduces the management overhead compared to fully arbitrary asynchronous scheduling, as the feedback timing follows predictable patterns within each group while still achieving lower latency than fully synchronized feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes to control feedback timing, where the feedback time unit is determined by changing parameters such as group index, configurable delay values (K1, K2, etc.), and timing offset parameters. This parameter-based control provides a systematic way to manage asynchronous feedback timing without requiring complex ad-hoc scheduling decisions, thereby reducing system complexity while achieving latency reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250351154A1Methods and apparatuses for scheduling multiple physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) transmissions
Publication Date: 2025.11.13 LENOVO (BEIJING) LTD
  • US20250351154A1 patent drawing
  • US20250351154A1 patent drawing
  • US20250351154A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present disclosure relate to methods and apparatuses for scheduling multiple physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) transmissions. According to an embodiment of the present disclosure, a user equipment (UE) can include: a processor configured to: determine a first number of time domain resources, wherein the first number of time domain resources are used to transmit a second number of PDSCH transmissions, and the second number of PDSCH transmissions includes a third number of PDSCH transmission groups; and determine a feedback time unit to transmit hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) information for a PDSCH transmission group of the third number of PDSCH transmission groups; a transmitter coupled to the processor and configured to transmit the HARQ information for the PDSCH transmission group in the determined feedback time unit; and a receiver coupled to the processor.