Composite Membrane with PEI and PHMB for Endotoxin Retention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing membrane manufacturing processes, particularly phase inversion processes, are limited in achieving optimal pore sizes and surface properties, which affects membrane separation performance and absorption properties.

Innovation Solution

A composite membrane is developed comprising a porous polymeric support structure coated with a polyethylene imine (PEI) layer and grafted with poly(hexamethylene biguanide) (PHMB), enhancing surface properties and filtration efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If phase inversion process is used for membrane manufacturing, then membrane production is achieved, but limitations in pore sizes and surface properties are imposed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepore size controlVSAvoidsurface properties
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by coating the membrane surface with polyethyleneimine (PEI) before final use. This pre-coating step modifies the surface properties to enhance endotoxin retention capabilities, addressing the limitation of the phase inversion process in achieving optimal surface properties. The PEI layer is applied in advance to ensure the membrane has the desired surface characteristics for specific filtration applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes by modifying the surface chemistry through PEI coating and subsequent PHMB grafting. These chemical modifications change the surface parameters (charge, hydrophilicity, reactivity) to improve endotoxin retention. The phase inversion process parameters are also optimized to achieve desired pore structures, demonstrating parameter changes to overcome the inherent limitations of the manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If membrane post-functionalization is applied, then surface functionalities are enhanced, but process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveendotoxin retentionVSAvoidmanufacturing process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the endotoxin retention functionality from the bulk membrane material and concentrates it at the surface through PEI coating and PHMB grafting. This separation allows the bulk membrane to maintain its filtration properties while the surface provides enhanced endotoxin retention, simplifying the overall design by localizing specific functions to where they are most needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite membrane structure combining the base polymer matrix with PEI coating layer and grafted PHMB molecules. This composite approach allows integration of multiple functions: the base membrane provides mechanical strength and pore structure, while the PEI-PHMB composite layer provides enhanced endotoxin retention. The composite structure resolves the complexity issue by systematically organizing different materials to perform specific functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If polyethylene imine coating and PHMB grafting are applied, then endotoxin retention is improved, but mechanical stability may be affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveendotoxin retentionVSAvoidmechanical stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by concentrating the PEI coating and PHMB grafting specifically at the membrane surface rather than throughout the bulk material. This localized modification ensures that endotoxin retention enhancement is achieved at the interface where it is most critical, while the bulk membrane retains its original mechanical properties and structural integrity. The surface-modified layer is designed to be thin enough to preserve overall membrane strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The composite membrane exhibits improved retention of endotoxins, high mechanical stability, and maintains filtration properties without deterioration, making it suitable for liquid filtration applications.

Implementation Method 1

a polyethylene imine (PEI) layer coated onto the support structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Implementation Method 2

poly(hexamethylene biguanide) (PHMB) grafted to the coating layer of the support structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical bonding: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 3

membrane separation performance (separation by size exclusion) as well as absorption properties (chemical and physical interactions of the medium and the membrane surface)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSize exclusion: Filter (physical)

Data Source

PatentEP4566699A1Composite membrane
Publication Date: 2025.06.11 GAMBRO LUNDIA AB
  • EP4566699A1 patent drawing
  • EP4566699A1 patent drawing
  • EP4566699A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a composite membrane comprising a porous support structure, a polyethylene imine (PEI) layer coated onto the support structure, and poly(hexamethylene biguanide) (PHMB) grafted to the coating layer of the support structure. The present disclosure also provides a method to produce the composite membrane. The present disclosure also provides a filtration and/or diffusion device comprising the composite membrane.