Peak-Buck Peak-Boost Control for Buck-Boost Regulators

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current switched step-up step-down regulators face issues with varying switching frequency, high output voltage ripples, noise mode transitions, reverse current problems, and low power efficiency, particularly in applications requiring continuous conduction mode and wide input voltage ranges.

Innovation Solution

A peak-buck peak-boost current mode control scheme is applied to synchronous and non-synchronous buck-boost regulators, enabling reverse current handling with low inductor and output voltage ripples, and high power efficiency across continuous and discontinuous conduction modes, using a mode selection circuit and switch control signals to manage switches effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If voltage mode control scheme is used, then fixed switching frequency and low output voltage ripples are achieved, but reverse current handling capability is poor and mode transitions generate large output transient ripples

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput voltage stabilityVSAvoidreverse current handling capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The control scheme dynamically switches between voltage mode control and pulse-skip/discontinuous conduction mode based on the operating conditions. When reverse current is detected during boost operation, the system transitions to pulse-skip mode, allowing the controller to adapt its control strategy in real-time to handle both stable voltage regulation and reverse current scenarios effectively

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the conduction mode parameter based on operating conditions. By detecting reverse current conditions and switching from forced continuous conduction mode to pulse-skip or burst discontinuous conduction mode, the system adjusts its operational parameters to achieve both stable voltage output and proper reverse current handling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If pulse-skip or burst discontinuous conduction mode is used for reverse current handling, then reverse current is managed, but large output transient ripples are generated during mode transitions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereverse current handling capabilityVSAvoidoutput voltage stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from the current sense amplifier to detect reverse current conditions and provides feedback to the controller. This feedback mechanism enables smooth mode transitions by allowing the controller to anticipate and prepare for the switch between voltage mode and pulse-skip mode, thereby minimizing output voltage transients and ripples during mode changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If conventional peak current mode control is used, then easy compensation and parallel outputs are achieved, but high inductor current ripples and low power efficiency occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompensation easeVSAvoidpower efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the control mode parameter based on the input-output voltage relationship. When operating in step-down mode, it uses peak-buck current mode control with easy compensation characteristics. When operating in step-up mode, it switches to peak-boost current mode control optimized for efficiency, thereby achieving both easy compensation and high power efficiency across different operating conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Loss of energy

If valley-buck peak-boost current mode control is used, then low inductor current ripples and high power efficiency are achieved, but reverse current detection capability is lacking and current-runaway conditions may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower efficiencyVSAvoidcurrent runaway prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback from the current sense amplifier that monitors inductor current in both buck and boost operations. This feedback enables the controller to detect reverse current conditions and enforce peak current limits during step-down operations, preventing current-runaway conditions while maintaining the high efficiency benefits of valley-buck peak-boost control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control scheme dynamically adjusts its behavior based on operating mode. During step-up operations, it activates reverse current detection capability. During step-down operations, it enforces peak current limiting to prevent current-runaway, thereby adapting its protective functions to the specific operating conditions while maintaining high efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP3002860B1Peak-buck peak-boost current-mode control for switched step-up step-down regulators
Publication Date: 2020.06.24 LINEAR TECHNOLOGY CORP
  • EP3002860B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3002860B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3002860B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A peak-buck peak-boost current mode control structure and scheme for a synchronous four-switch and non-synchronous two-switch buck-boost regulators sense input and output voltages to smoothly transition between buck mode, buck-boost mode, and boost mode for high power efficiency and low output ripples. With the inductor current sensing, the control scheme achieves the best performance in continuous conduction and discontinuous condition mode operations.