Peak Junction Temperature Sensing for Semiconductor SOA Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for protecting semiconductor devices from safe operating area (SOA) violations, such as temperature sensing and overcurrent protection, are inadequate as they fail to accurately detect peak junction temperatures, leading to potential device destruction due to excessive heat.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a peak power dissipation sensor, a temperature sensor, and a peak junction temperature computation circuit that calculates the peak junction temperature based on sensed peak power dissipation and average temperature, allowing for accurate detection of thermal SOA violations by comparing the computed peak junction temperature with a maximum allowable threshold.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a conventional temperature sensor is used near the output driver device, then the sensor can sense the average temperature in the vicinity, but it fails to accurately detect peak junction temperature excursions, leading to undetected SOA violations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature measurement accuracyVSAvoidSOA violation detection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a computational intermediary that processes multiple temperature readings from different locations and time points to derive the peak junction temperature. Instead of relying on a single sensor near the driver, the system uses temperature readings from various points (including embedded sensors and external sensors) combined with thermal modeling to calculate the peak temperature that occurs during transient conditions, thereby achieving accurate SOA violation detection without requiring a sensor directly at the junction point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If an embedded temperature sensor is used within the device, then the sensor is positioned close to the heat source, but it suffers from false trip and latch up issues caused by parasitic junctions and layout-dependent inaccuracies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepeak junction temperature measurement accuracyVSAvoiddevice operational reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses computational thermal modeling as an intermediary to bridge the gap between embedded sensor readings and actual peak junction temperature. The system combines readings from embedded sensors with thermal resistance networks and transient thermal models to calculate the true peak junction temperature, thereby avoiding the false trips caused by direct embedded sensor readings while maintaining measurement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the temperature sensing function from being solely dependent on embedded sensors within the high-power device. Instead, it separates the sensing function (using external or less intrusive sensors) from the measurement function (using computational models to derive peak junction temperature), thereby eliminating the parasitic effects and latch-up issues associated with embedded sensors while maintaining accurate temperature monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Device complexity

If overcurrent protection is used to protect against SOA violations, then the protection mechanism is simple to implement, but it is inadequate because SOA violations can occur at lower current levels when voltage across the device is higher

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection circuit complexityVSAvoidSOA violation protection effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the simple overcurrent protection mechanism with a thermal-based protection system that monitors actual junction temperature and power dissipation. Instead of relying on current thresholds, the system uses temperature sensors combined with thermal models to detect when the device approaches dangerous temperature levels, providing accurate SOA violation protection that accounts for the relationship between voltage, current, and temperature rather than simply limiting current.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP2559984B1System for peak junction temperatur sensing and thermal safe operating area protection
Publication Date: 2019.03.27 CIRRUS LOGIC INC
  • EP2559984B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2559984B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2559984B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

A peak junction temperature monitoring system for a semiconductor device includes a peak power dissipation sensor for sensing the peak power dissipation in the device. A temperature sensor senses an average temperature of the device, and a peak junction temperature computation circuit generates a signal representative of a peak junction temperature based on input from the peak power dissipation sensor and the temperature sensor.