Mechanical Dewatering of Peat Using Filter Press

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for reducing the moisture content of peat, such as thermal drying and mechanical dewatering, are costly and inefficient, often requiring additional thermal drying steps to achieve the necessary moisture levels for various applications, and can alter the composition of peat, making it unsuitable for certain uses.

Innovation Solution

A mechanical demoisturizing process using a filter press with porous membranes that increases the moisture content of peat to 90-99% before applying pressure to remove polar liquids, resulting in a uniform filter cake with a moisture content as low as 60%, without the use of thermal heat or superheated steam, and allows for further drying to meet specific end-use requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If thermal drying is used to reduce moisture content of peat, then moisture content is reduced to required levels, but operating costs increase and peat composition is altered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemoisture contentVSAvoidcost and composition alteration
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The peat material is pre-treated by mixing with water to achieve optimal moisture content (90-99%) before mechanical dewatering. This preliminary hydration step ensures the peat is in the best state for subsequent mechanical water removal, allowing efficient dewatering without thermal processing that would alter composition or increase costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces thermal drying systems with a mechanical dewatering system using a filter press. The filter press applies mechanical pressure to remove water from peat slurry, eliminating the need for expensive thermal dryers while achieving the same moisture reduction goal without altering peat composition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Object-generated harmful factors

If mechanical dewatering is used to reduce moisture content, then operating costs are reduced, but moisture content reduction is insufficient and additional thermal drying is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating costVSAvoidmoisture content
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The peat is pre-hydrated to optimal moisture levels (90-99%) before mechanical dewatering. This preliminary step ensures maximum water content is available for mechanical removal, allowing the filter press to achieve significant moisture reduction (to 60% or lower) in a single step, eliminating the need for additional thermal drying

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the moisture content parameter to an optimal range (90-99%) before mechanical dewatering. This parameter optimization enables the mechanical system to achieve complete moisture reduction to target levels (60% or lower) without requiring supplemental thermal processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If peat is air-dried in the field for extended periods, then moisture content is reduced, but production time increases and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemoisture contentVSAvoiddrying time
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces natural air-drying with mechanical dewatering using a filter press. This mechanical system actively removes water through applied pressure rather than relying on passive evaporation, reducing the drying process from months to a single operational cycle and dramatically cutting production time and associated costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Quantity of substance

If vacuum harvesting is used for Sphagnum peat, then moisture content is reduced to 35%, but equipment cost increases and operational window is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemoisture contentVSAvoidequipment cost and operational constraints
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces expensive vacuum harvesting equipment with a filter press system that uses hydraulic or mechanical pressure for dewatering. This substitution reduces equipment complexity and cost while expanding the operational window, as the filter press is not constrained by weather conditions like vacuum harvesters are

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the dewatering mechanism from vacuum suction to positive pressure filtration. This parameter change allows the system to handle peat with a broader range of initial moisture contents and eliminates the operational constraints of vacuum systems, achieving effective dewatering without expensive specialized equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process significantly reduces the need for thermal dryers and expensive mechanical equipment, lowers operating costs, produces a more uniform peat product, and enhances its usability in applications like combustion fuel and industrial products, while minimizing environmental impact.

Implementation Method 1

the pressure condition inside the filter press is increased to force the polar liquids from the admixture through the porous membrane

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure gradient: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

a filter press having a plurality of filter plates with porous membranes secured along their outlet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFiltration: Filter (physical)

Implementation Method 3

porous membranes secured along their outlet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPorosity: Porosity

Data Source

PatentUS10072214B1Mechanical demoisturizing of partially-decomposed organic material
Publication Date: 2018.09.11 AMERICAN PEAT TECHNOLOGY LLC
  • US10072214B1 patent drawing
  • US10072214B1 patent drawing
  • US10072214B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A process for the preparation of a concentrated filter cake from an admixture of partially-decomposed organic material and a polar liquid using a filter press without the input of thermal heat or superheated steam or other pressurized gas or liquid is provided by this invention. The admixture is mixed with an additional amount of the polar liquid to produce a feed slurry of the admixture having a moisture content of about 90-99% wt. The resulting slurry admixture is then introduced into the filter press having a plurality of filter plates with porous membranes secured along their outlet. The pressure condition introduced inside the filter plate chambers is increased by a pressurized gas or liquid to force the polar liquid from the admixture slurry though apertures contained in the membrane, thereby leaving a filter cake of the partially-decomposed organic material having a moisture content that is lower than the moisture content of the initial partially-decomposed organic material feed. The process and its equipment may be used to treat a variety of partially-decomposed organic material/polar liquid slurry admixtures, including high moisture peat containing water, and reduce the moisture content of the resulting peat filter cake to as low as 60% wt.