Vehicle Pedal Arm Rib Design for Strength and Weight

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle pedal arm designs using resin materials face limitations in increasing cross-sectional areas of side beams and ribs to achieve required strength and stiffness, especially when subjected to large depressing forces like those in brake pedals, while also needing to reduce weight and prevent interference with peripheral components.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle pedal arm design featuring a body with multiple ribs arranged in a standing manner, including first and second ribs that connect holes for shafts, with specific angles and orientations to distribute stress, and thickened or lightened portions to enhance strength and stiffness, allowing for integral molding and weight saving.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the cross-sectional areas of side beams and ribs are increased to improve strength and stiffness, then the strength and stiffness are improved, but the weight of the pedal arm increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrength and stiffnessVSAvoidweight of pedal arm
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by varying the cross-sectional areas of ribs in different regions of the pedal arm. Specifically, the first rib connecting to the depressing portion has a larger cross-sectional area to handle higher stress, while the second rib has a smaller cross-sectional area. This localized optimization provides necessary strength where needed while minimizing weight in less critical areas, resolving the contradiction between strength and weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a two-dimensional planar structure to a three-dimensional curved structure by bending the pedal arm in the width direction. This dimensional change allows the arm to navigate around peripheral components while maintaining structural integrity through strategically placed ribs that compensate for the curvature-induced stress distribution changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the pedal arm is curved to prevent interference with peripheral components, then interference is prevented, but the strength and stiffness may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference preventionVSAvoidstrength and stiffness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by curving the pedal arm in the width direction (another dimension) rather than compromising the vertical or longitudinal dimensions. This allows the arm to fit around peripheral components while maintaining adequate strength through proper rib placement and cross-sectional area optimization that compensates for the curvature effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite material construction by combining resin material with strategically designed rib structures. The rib-reinforced resin composite provides both the curvature needed to avoid interference and the necessary strength and stiffness, as the ribs create a composite structure that resists bending and twisting forces despite the curved geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Weight of moving object

If resin material is used for weight saving, then weight is reduced, but the strength and stiffness are insufficient for large depressing forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight of pedal armVSAvoidstrength and stiffness
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a composite structure by combining resin material with a strategically designed rib reinforcement system. The resin provides lightweight properties while the ribs, positioned and sized optimally, provide the necessary structural strength and stiffness to handle large depressing forces. This composite approach allows the pedal arm to be both lightweight and strong.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by concentrating rib structures in specific high-stress regions of the resin pedal arm, such as near the depressing portion and shaft connection points. This localized reinforcement provides the necessary strength where forces are applied while keeping the rest of the resin structure lightweight, resolving the contradiction between weight saving and strength requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10071765B2Vehicle pedal arm
Publication Date: 2018.09.11 F TECH INC
  • US10071765B2 patent drawing
  • US10071765B2 patent drawing
  • US10071765B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle pedal arm has a first rib connecting a first hole, into which a first shaft is inserted, and a peripheral edge on a side of a rear wall continuous of at least one of a left side wall and a right side wall in an arm body continuous upward from a first bent portion that bends in a rear direction side of a vehicle as being a lower side of the vehicle, to extend on a first straight line connecting a depressing portion and the first hole in a side view, and a second rib connecting a second hole, into which a second shaft is inserted, and the peripheral edge on a side of the rear wall continuous of the at least one of the both side walls to extend on a second straight line connecting the depressing portion and the second hole in a side view.