Non-Hydraulic Pedal Simulator With Sequential Reaction Force Build-Up

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Hydraulic brake systems experience degraded pedal feeling during regenerative braking, leading to inconsistencies between driver input and brake pad pressure, potentially causing safety issues and frequent consumable part replacement.

Innovation Solution

A non-hydraulic pedal simulator that generates pedal force without hydraulic pressure, using a housing part, piston part, mounting reaction part, support reaction part, and moving reaction part, along with a magnetic force generator and position detector, to sequentially increase reaction forces and mimic the brake feeling of a hydraulic booster.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If hydraulic pressure is used in brake systems, then brake force can be generated, but pedal feeling is degraded during regenerative braking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake forceVSAvoidpedal feeling
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The brake system is segmented into two independent force generation paths: a hydraulic pressure generation unit for generating brake force, and a pedal simulator unit for generating pedal reaction force. This segmentation allows each unit to be optimized independently - the hydraulic unit for brake force and the pedal simulator for pedal feeling, resolving the contradiction between brake force generation and pedal feeling maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The pedal simulator acts as an intermediary between the driver's pedal input and the hydraulic brake system. It generates a reaction force that mimics the expected hydraulic booster feedback, mediating the interaction between the driver and the actual brake system while maintaining natural pedal feeling even when hydraulic pressure changes occur during regenerative braking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If hydraulic pressure changes during regenerative braking, then regenerative braking is achieved, but inconsistency between driver input and brake pad pressure occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregenerative brakingVSAvoidbraking consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The pedal simulator incorporates a reaction force generation unit that provides real-time feedback to the driver through the brake pedal. This feedback mechanism compensates for changes in hydraulic pressure during regenerative braking, maintaining consistent perceived braking force and ensuring the driver's input remains consistent with the actual brake pad pressure applied.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If hydraulic pressure is used, then brake system function is achieved, but safety accidents may occur due to degraded pedal feeling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake system functionVSAvoidsafety accidents
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The pedal simulator provides beforehand cushioning by pre-establishing a reliable reaction force generation mechanism that compensates for potential hydraulic system failures or anomalies. This protective layer ensures that even if the hydraulic system malfunctions, the driver receives appropriate feedback through the pedal, preventing safety accidents caused by degraded pedal feeling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

4Power

If hydraulic pressure dependency exists, then brake force generation is efficient, but frequent consumable part replacement is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake force generation efficiencyVSAvoidconsumable part lifespan
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The pedal simulator extracts the pedal feeling generation function from the hydraulic brake system. By separating the reaction force generation task from the hydraulic pressure system, the simulator reduces the workload and stress on hydraulic components and consumable parts like brake pads, thereby extending their lifespan while maintaining efficient brake force generation through the hydraulic unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The non-hydraulic pedal simulator provides a consistent brake feeling similar to hydraulic boosters, reducing the risk of safety accidents and consumable part wear by eliminating hydraulic pressure dependency.

Implementation Method 1

a moving spring part disposed between the moving support part and the support reaction part, and configured to support the moving support part by using a spring force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Implementation Method 2

made of an elastic material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS11834024B2Non-hydraulic pedal simulator
Publication Date: 2023.12.05 HYUNDAI MOBIS CO LTD
  • US11834024B2 patent drawing
  • US11834024B2 patent drawing
  • US11834024B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A non-hydraulic pedal simulator may include: a housing part; a piston part inserted into the housing part, and moveable in connection with a pedal rod part; a mounting reaction part mounted on the piston part; a support reaction part inserted into the housing part, disposed on a moving path of the mounting reaction part, and configured to support the mounting reaction part; and a moving reaction part disposed between the piston part and the support reaction part, configured to elastically support the piston part, and supported by the support reaction part while being moved by the piston part.