Vehicle Pedal Transfer Function Adjustment for Energy Conservation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Vehicles, especially electric and hybrid vehicles, face energy conservation challenges due to inefficient driving habits that lead to rapid starts and stops, increasing energy consumption and emissions, and limited geographical access to refilling stations.

Innovation Solution

A method that adjusts the relationship between accelerator pedal position and powertrain torque request based on geographical location, weather conditions, and prior travel history to optimize energy use, reducing wheel slip and improving drivability by modifying torque and braking power requests.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the vehicle provides high performance feel with increased torque request, then driver satisfaction improves, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver satisfactionVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the accelerator pedal transfer function based on geographical location, weather conditions, and travel history. The relationship between accelerator pedal position and torque request is made variable rather than fixed, allowing the system to optimize between performance feel and energy consumption根据不同 conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters of the accelerator pedal transfer function (torque request vs. pedal position relationship) based on external conditions such as geographical location, weather, and historical travel data. This allows optimization of energy consumption while maintaining appropriate performance characteristics for different driving scenarios

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Use of energy by moving object

If the vehicle reduces torque request to conserve energy, then energy consumption decreases, but drivability and performance feel deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoiddrivability
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system makes the torque request dynamic by adjusting the accelerator pedal transfer function based on real-time conditions including geographical location, weather, and travel history. This ensures that energy conservation measures do not permanently degrade drivability but are contextually appropriate

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system modifies the parameters of the torque request relationship based on environmental and operational conditions, allowing energy consumption to be reduced when appropriate while maintaining drivability when needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of energy

If the vehicle increases regenerative braking power, then energy recovery improves, but wheel locking risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy recoveryVSAvoidwheel locking risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from geographical location data, weather conditions, and historical travel information to adjust regenerative braking power requests. This feedback mechanism allows the system to maximize energy recovery while avoiding conditions that would lead to wheel locking

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the regenerative braking power request parameters based on external conditions such as location, weather, and historical data, optimizing energy recovery while maintaining safety by reducing regenerative braking when wheel locking risk is present

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Use of energy by moving object

If the vehicle adjusts torque and braking based on geographical location and conditions, then energy conservation improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy conservationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a multi-functional approach where a single controller integrates multiple functions: geographical location determination, weather condition monitoring, travel history analysis, and both torque request and braking power optimization. This consolidates complexity into a unified system rather than separate components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system manages complexity by dynamically adjusting parameters of existing control relationships (accelerator pedal transfer function, braking power request) rather than adding new hardware components, achieving energy conservation through software-based parameter optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11440417B2System and method for adjusting vehicle performance
Publication Date: 2022.09.13 DANA AUTOMOTIVE SYST GRP LLC
  • US11440417B2 patent drawing
  • US11440417B2 patent drawing
  • US11440417B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for operating axles of a vehicle are provided. In one example, relationships between accelerator pedal position and driver demand torque may be adjusted as a function of a vehicle's geographical location. Further, a relationship between brake pedal position and requested braking amount may be adjusted as a function of a vehicle's geographical location.