Pedal Travel Simulator Spring Ring Stroke Limiting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pedal travel simulators for hydraulic vehicle power braking systems lack effective mechanisms to limit piston stroke and manage spring tensioning, leading to inefficiencies in brake fluid displacement and actuation force simulation.

Innovation Solution

A pedal travel simulator design featuring a cup-shaped cover with a helical compression spring and a spring ring that limits piston stroke, along with a fitting to hold the spring elements, allowing pre-assembly and simplifying assembly, and utilizing a second spring element for simulating the 'jump-in' actuation force.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If no piston stop is provided, then the piston can move freely in the cylinder, but the cover is subjected to excessive piston force due to brake pressure and the spring element is overly tensioned

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecover force managementVSAvoidpiston stroke limitation mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The piston stop function is extracted as a separate component (spring ring) from the cover structure, allowing the cover to focus on its primary function of containing the spring element while the spring ring specifically handles the piston stroke limitation and force management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The spring ring acts as an intermediary component between the piston and the cover, mediating the interaction by limiting piston stroke and thereby controlling the force transmitted to the cover and the tension on the spring element

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If the first spring element acts on the piston over its entire stroke, then continuous force is applied, but the spring element cannot be properly tensioned and the actuation force simulation is inaccurate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuation force simulation accuracyVSAvoidspring element tensioning
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The spring element's engagement is segmented into two phases: initially held in a tensioned state by the fitting during assembly, then released to act on the piston only after the piston reaches a certain position in its stroke, achieving both proper tensioning and accurate force simulation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The spring element is pre-tensioned during assembly by the fitting before the piston begins its stroke, ensuring the spring is properly prepared to provide accurate actuation force simulation when the piston reaches the appropriate position

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of manufacture

If the cover, fitting, and spring element are assembled separately, then each component can be manufactured independently, but the assembly process becomes complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent manufacturing independenceVSAvoidpedal travel simulator assembly efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The cover, fitting, and spring element are merged into a pre-assembled unit that is manufactured and tested as an integrated component set, then installed as a single unit in the pedal travel simulator, combining the benefits of independent manufacturing with simplified final assembly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The fitting and spring element are preliminarily assembled with the cover in a pre-assembly step before installation into the complete pedal travel simulator, allowing for quality control and proper positioning to be established early in the manufacturing process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively limits piston stroke, manages spring tension, and enhances the simulation of actuation forces, improving the efficiency of brake fluid displacement and actuation in hydraulic vehicle power braking systems.

Implementation Method 1

A first spring element (8) that acts on the piston (4) to move it into the cylinder (3) is situated in the cover (5)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic force: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a spring ring (19) that is inserted into a circumferential groove between the piston (4) and the cover (5) and that protrudes inwardly from the groove, so that the spring ring (19) forms a piston stop that limits the stroke of the piston (4) in the direction of the cover (5)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical constraint: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 3

when actuated it displaces brake fluid into the pedal travel simulator (1), which communicates with the master brake cylinder during the power braking

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic pressure: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentUS20230047674A1Pedal travel simulator for a hydraulic vehicle power braking system
Publication Date: 2023.02.16 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US20230047674A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A stroke of a piston of a pedal travel simulator is limited via a spring ring that is inserted into a circumferential groove in a cylinder of the pedal travel simulator. The spring ring relieves the load on a cover of the pedal travel simulator that closes the cylinder of the pedal travel simulator.