Pedestrian Collision Warning With External Buffer Deployment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing collision avoidance systems in autonomous vehicles often fail to prevent accidents caused by unpredictable pedestrian movements and do not provide adequate warnings to pedestrians, as they primarily rely on driver alerts and vehicle maneuvers without effectively mitigating the risk of collision.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle-mounted collision warning system that includes a collision warning device to analyze the risk of collision with surrounding objects, a classifying device to identify pedestrians, and a control device to deploy a buffer element such as an airbag to absorb impact, while providing warnings to pedestrians to avoid collisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a collision avoidance system provides only driver alerts and vehicle maneuvers, then the system complexity is reduced, but the effectiveness in preventing collisions with unpredictable pedestrians is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision prevention effectivenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the collision avoidance function into multiple independent modules: detection unit (sensors), prediction unit (collision risk calculation), warning unit (pedestrian alert), and mitigation unit (buffer element deployment). Each module operates independently but coordinates through a central control system, allowing the complex function to be divided into manageable components while improving overall reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by predicting potential collision risks before actual collision occurs. The prediction unit calculates collision probability and time-to-collision in advance, allowing the warning unit to alert pedestrians proactively and the buffer element to be deployed preemptively, rather than reacting only after collision detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the system deploys buffer elements and provides pedestrian warnings, then collision risk is reduced, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision risk to pedestriansVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit serves as an intermediary that coordinates between the detection unit, prediction unit, warning unit, and buffer element deployment mechanism. It processes information from sensors, calculates collision risk, and triggers appropriate responses (warnings or buffer deployment) based on predefined thresholds, thereby managing system complexity through centralized coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters dynamically based on detected conditions: it adjusts warning intensity, buffer element deployment timing, and deployment position based on calculated collision risk parameters such as time-to-collision and impact velocity. This allows the system to adapt its response to varying threat levels without requiring completely different system architectures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the system frequently deploys buffer elements and brakes, then collision protection is improved, but fuel efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepedestrian protectionVSAvoidfuel efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by deploying the buffer element and applying brakes only when collision risk exceeds a specific threshold, rather than continuously. The prediction unit calculates whether intervention is necessary based on time-to-collision and impact velocity, allowing normal driving to continue uninterrupted when no threat is detected, thus preserving fuel efficiency while maintaining protection when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from the detection unit and prediction unit to continuously monitor collision risk and adjust buffer element deployment and braking actions accordingly. This closed-loop control ensures that energy-consuming actions are taken only when necessary, balancing protection reliability with fuel efficiency by responding to actual conditions rather than operating continuously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP4112405B1Vehicle including an apparatus with collision warning
Publication Date: 2024.01.31 HYUNDAI MOBIS CO LTD
  • EP4112405B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4112405B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4112405B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An apparatus for warning the collision of a vehicle includes an information acquirer configured to acquire information on a surrounding object and information on a vehicle, and a controller configured to generate collision predicting information for the surrounding object, based on the information on the surrounding object and the information on the vehicle, and generate control information to control braking of the vehicle and to provide, based on the collision predicting information, a buffer element to an outside of the vehicle while controlling the braking of the vehicle.