Vehicle Collision Warning for Pedestrian Alerts and Selective Braking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional collision avoidance systems in vehicles with autonomous driving technology fail to prevent collisions with pedestrians due to unexpected movements, as they primarily focus on providing warnings to the vehicle driver and not the pedestrian, and do not account for varying collision risks.

Innovation Solution

A collision warning apparatus that utilizes sensors to detect surrounding objects, calculates collision prediction information including location, time to collision, and risk, and provides warnings or controls vehicle braking based on these calculations to prevent collisions with pedestrians.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the collision avoidance system provides warnings only to the vehicle driver, then the driver receives timely alerts, but collision accidents caused by unexpected pedestrian movement cannot be prevented

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision prevention capabilityVSAvoidwarning coverage scope
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an external warning device as an intermediary between the vehicle's collision detection system and pedestrians. This external warning device receives collision risk information from the controller and transmits warnings directly to pedestrians through speakers or light emitters positioned outside the vehicle, enabling direct communication with vulnerable road users rather than relying solely on driver awareness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The warning system is segmented into multiple independent warning channels: internal warnings to the driver (steering wheel vibration, seat vibration, audio warnings) and external warnings to pedestrians (external speakers, light emitters). This segmentation allows the system to simultaneously address both driver awareness and pedestrian alertness without interference between the two functions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If the collision avoidance system provides uniform warnings to all detected objects, then the system is simple to operate, but it cannot provide differentiated warnings based on collision risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision risk assessment accuracyVSAvoidwarning classification system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by providing different warning intensities and types to different surrounding objects based on their individual collision risks. The controller calculates separate collision risks for each detected object and selectively activates warning devices according to the specific risk level of each object, rather than applying a uniform warning threshold to all objects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes warning parameters (intensity, type, duration) based on calculated collision risk parameters. When collision risk exceeds a threshold, the controller activates external warning devices with intensity proportional to the risk level, allowing dynamic adjustment of warning characteristics to match the actual danger level of each situation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the vehicle performs braking for all detected collision risks, then collision prevention is maximized, but unnecessary braking actions occur reducing productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidance effectivenessVSAvoidvehicle operation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements partial action by providing external warnings to pedestrians without immediately activating full vehicle braking for all detected risks. The controller first attempts to alert pedestrians through external warning devices, and only initiates vehicle braking when the collision risk exceeds a higher threshold or when pedestrian avoidance is insufficient, thereby avoiding unnecessary braking while maintaining safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP4113479B1Apparatus for collision warning and vehicle including the same
Publication Date: 2025.08.27 HYUNDAI MOBIS CO LTD
  • EP4113479B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4113479B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4113479B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

According to an aspect of the present disclosure, a collision warning apparatus of a vehicle may include an information acquisition device that obtains surrounding object information and vehicle information and a controller that generates collision prediction information of a surrounding object based on the surrounding object information and the vehicle information and provides a warning to an outside of the vehicle or generates control information for controlling braking of the vehicle while providing the warning to the outside of the vehicle based on the collision prediction information.