Pedestrian Detection via Multi-Stage Window Calibration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional monitoring cameras face difficulties in accurately tracing pedestrians due to environmental interference and varying pedestrian positions or angles, leading to decreased detection accuracy and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A pedestrian detection method that forms multiple detecting windows within a monitoring frame using object analysis, human form detection, and human local detection functions to reduce the search area and calibrate the detection windows for precise head or face identification, enabling accurate detection even when pedestrians are partially obscured or at unusual angles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional monitoring camera uses human face detection or human form detection to scan the entire monitoring frame, then it can trace pedestrians, but the operation is complicated and detection accuracy decreases due to environmental interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidoperation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection process is segmented into multiple stages: first detecting window for initial pedestrian detection, second detecting window for refined detection, and third detecting window for head/face detection. Each stage focuses on a smaller, more specific region, reducing computational complexity while improving accuracy. The segmentation divides the monitoring frame into progressively smaller detection regions, making the overall system more manageable and accurate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary detection actions by first identifying potential pedestrian regions using the first detecting window before conducting more detailed analysis. This preliminary action filters out non-pedestrian regions early in the process, reducing the search space for subsequent detection stages and improving overall detection accuracy while reducing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If the monitoring camera is fixed and scans the entire monitoring frame, then it can detect pedestrians at any position, but the detection efficiency decreases when pedestrians are partially obscured or at unusual angles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection coverageVSAvoiddetection efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection windows dynamically adjust their size and position based on the detected pedestrian characteristics. The first detecting window adapts to locate pedestrians anywhere in the frame, the second detecting window refines the detection region based on initial findings, and the third detecting window further adapts to focus on head/face regions. This dynamic adjustment maintains detection coverage while significantly improving efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Different detection windows apply different detection strategies to different regions of the monitoring frame. The first detecting window uses broad pedestrian detection, the second uses refined form detection, and the third uses specialized head/face detection. This local quality approach ensures high detection efficiency for each region type while maintaining overall adaptability across the entire monitoring frame.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If the monitoring camera uses multiple detection functions to improve accuracy, then detection precision increases, but the computational load increases requiring more hardware resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepedestrian detection accuracyVSAvoidcomputational energy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The computational task is segmented across three detecting windows that process progressively smaller regions. The first detecting window handles broad pedestrian detection, the second handles refined form detection in a smaller region, and the third handles head/face detection in an even smaller region. This segmentation reduces the total computational energy required compared to applying a single comprehensive detection function to the entire monitoring frame.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies detection functions selectively rather than uniformly across the entire frame. By using partial action - applying detailed head/face detection only to regions where pedestrians are already detected by previous windows - the system achieves high detection accuracy while minimizing unnecessary computational energy expenditure on regions without pedestrians.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10719707B2Pedestrian detection method and related monitoring camera
Publication Date: 2020.07.21 VIVOTEK INC
  • US10719707B2 patent drawing
  • US10719707B2 patent drawing
  • US10719707B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A pedestrian detection method is applied to a monitoring camera. The pedestrian detection method includes forming a first detecting window on at least one monitoring frame via an object analysis function, utilizing a human form detection function to modulate the first detecting window for forming a second detecting window, analyzing the second detecting window via a human local detection function to mark an upper detecting window about a pedestrian on the monitoring frame, and determining whether to calibrate the second detecting window via analysis of the upper detecting window.